2006
DOI: 10.1007/11730095_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trade Off Between Diversity and Quality for Multi-objective Workforce Scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This objective is to maximise the total priority of tasks scheduled while minimising travel time and cost. Values are scaled so that this expression is a realistic representation of solution quality for a large class of problems encountered in practice (Cowling et al, 2006).…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This objective is to maximise the total priority of tasks scheduled while minimising travel time and cost. Values are scaled so that this expression is a realistic representation of solution quality for a large class of problems encountered in practice (Cowling et al, 2006).…”
Section: (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tasks require between one and three skills and resources possess between one and five skills. The problems reflect realistic problems Trimble have identified and are generated using a commercial problem instance generator (Cowling et al, 2006). The size of the problems was chosen to be solvable in a reasonable amount of CPU time.…”
Section: Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on task-based adaptation, [20] near-optimal resource allocations and reallocations of human tasks were presented. Workforce scheduling research investigates the impact of weights on the multiple, at times contradicting, objectives in real work workforce scheduling [8]. Staff scheduling related to closed systems was discussed in [5,10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real world situations it might be necessary to consider multiple and potentially conflicting objectives, typically resulting in the combined schedule evaluation function ϕ being complex and highly dynamic (see [46] and [47] for the discussion of related approaches).…”
Section: Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%