2012
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2011.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical study of hyperheuristics for managing very large sets of low level heuristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cases examined, this trade-off was beneficial as the hyper-heuristic was able to find more optimal solutions when provided with additional genetic material. If at some point this trade-off no longer is beneficial, then reducing/partitioning the primitives may become useful [17]. It was also found that the arity of the genetic material can have a large impact on the increase in search space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cases examined, this trade-off was beneficial as the hyper-heuristic was able to find more optimal solutions when provided with additional genetic material. If at some point this trade-off no longer is beneficial, then reducing/partitioning the primitives may become useful [17]. It was also found that the arity of the genetic material can have a large impact on the increase in search space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are methodologies that can cut across categories. For example, we can see hybrid methodologies that combine constructive with perturbation heuristics (see eg Garrido and Riff, 2010), or heuristic selection with heuristic generation (Krasnogor and Gustafson, 2004;Maturana et al, 2010;Remde et al, 2012).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Remde et al (2009) a tabu search-based hyper-heuristic dynamically adapting the tabu tenures is applied to the same problem and framework. A comprehensive study on this framework is presented in Remde et al (2012), where several hyper-heuristics are compared against a Variable Neighbourhood and a Greedy Selection method with favourable results. The best performing hyper-heuristics depend on the allotted CPU time.…”
Section: Approaches Based On Constructive Low-level Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the large number of experiments and the long training time required, a modified master-slave parallel GA (used in [40]) was used with a network of 35 PCs to speed up this stage of training. For example, the completion of one generation using only one PC takes approximately 450 s, which is decreased sharply to approximately 19 s with 35 PCs.…”
Section: Learning Gafnnmentioning
confidence: 99%