1982
DOI: 10.1080/02723646.1982.10642224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Topographic Relative Moisture Index: An Approach to Soil-Moisture Assessment in Mountain Terrain

Abstract: The Topographic Relative Moisture Index (TRMI), designed to indicate the relative soil moisture availability among sites in mountain terrain, is described. The TRMI is a summed scalar index of four slope parameters: topographic position, slope aspect, steepness, and slope configuration. A review of other methods of characterizing site moisture relations, including direct monitoring, water-balance climatology, site index, and other inferential topographic/edaphic indices, reveals that the simple, straightforwar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
138
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
138
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…: TM = 5.68-A + 3.32 + 4.42"e -°'°°Sl*sl°p~, where A = 1.73 for ridge tops, 1.49 for upper third of slopes, 0.7 for middle third of slopes and benches, 0.25 for draws, 0.07 for lower third of slopes, 0.03 for toe slopes, and 0 for valley bottoms). This index decreases with slope and drier topographic positions, and although similar to Parker's (1982) index, variables are combined differently, and the regional index was much more significant in the analyses. Climatic variables were extracted by geographic overlay of plot coordinates with maps created by the PRISM model, which uses elevation and coarse-scale aspect to interpolate data from climate stations (Daly et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…: TM = 5.68-A + 3.32 + 4.42"e -°'°°Sl*sl°p~, where A = 1.73 for ridge tops, 1.49 for upper third of slopes, 0.7 for middle third of slopes and benches, 0.25 for draws, 0.07 for lower third of slopes, 0.03 for toe slopes, and 0 for valley bottoms). This index decreases with slope and drier topographic positions, and although similar to Parker's (1982) index, variables are combined differently, and the regional index was much more significant in the analyses. Climatic variables were extracted by geographic overlay of plot coordinates with maps created by the PRISM model, which uses elevation and coarse-scale aspect to interpolate data from climate stations (Daly et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Raster datasets for slope, aspect, and curvature were generated using Spatial Analyst tools in ArcMap 10.1. Aspect was classified so that values ranged from 0 (xeric) to 20 (mesic) (Parker 1982). Pixels were categorized by four topographic position index (TPI) classes (valley bottom, gentle slope, steep slope, ridgetop) using the CorridorDesigner toolbox (Majka et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some biophysical and demographic variables shown to be strongly correlated with forest cover dynamics in previous spatially explicit models (Southworth and Tucker 2001;Nagendra et al 2003;McConnell et al 2004;Southworth et al 2004) were selected for use as predictor variables in these logistic regression models. These included elevation, slope, and aspect [converted into soil moisture classes (Parker 1982)], all derived from a digital elevation model acquired by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) (Berry et al 2007), together with distance to the nearest forest edge in 1994 and human population density. The latter was calculated as the density of human settlements (Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of Conservation Policies On Forest Cover Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained by the fact that forest areas in higher elevations were harvested during the 1990s while at lower elevations, which had been harvested earlier (i.e., during the 1970s and 1980s), forest recovery took place during the 1990s (He et al 2009). Aspect, which was converted into soil moisture classes (Parker 1982), was negatively related to the probability of forest loss and positively related with the probability of forest recovery. As this relative scalar is associated in temperate regions with soil moisture in response to differences in solar illumination (Parker 1982), this result suggests that the probability of forest recovery is higher in mesic areas (e.g., north-facing slopes) while the probability of forest loss was higher in drier/sunnier areas (e.g., south-facing slopes).…”
Section: Influence Of Conservation Policies On Forest Cover Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation