The top 100 cited articles in urology

Hennessey, Kiara; Afshar, Kourosh; MacNeily, Andrew E.

doi:10.5489/cuaj.1123

Cited by 121 publications

(109 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, few RCTs were found among the top medical articles; for example, there were 14 RCTs in urology 8 , 9 in rehabilitation 10 , and 0 in orthopedics 12 and endodontology 13 . There are several possible explanations for the lack of RCTs in orthodontics.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 The Web of Science, an intelligent research platform, has access to the world's leading citation databases, making cited reference searching possible. 3 Recently, numerous citation analyses and top-cited articles have become available in various specialties, such as dermatology, 4 general surgery, 5 anesthetics, 6 plastic surgery, 7 urology, 8 neurosurgery, 9 rehabilitation, 10 ophthalmology, 11 orthopedic surgery, 12 and endodontics. 13 In the past 4 years, more analogous articles have been found in the Science Citation Index.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics from 1975 to 2011

Hui

Han

Geng

et al. 2012

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To identify the 100 top-cited articles published in orthodontics journals and to analyze their characteristics to investigate the achievement and development of orthodontics research in past decades. Methods and Materials: The Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge Database and the 2011 Journal Citation Report Science Editions were used to retrieve the 100 top-cited articles published in orthodontics journals since 1975. Some basic information was collected by the Analyze Tool on the Web of Science, including citation time, publication title, journal name, publication year, and country and institution of origin. A further study was then performed to determine authorship, article type, field of study, study design, and level of evidence. Results: The 100 target articles were retrieved from three journals: American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (n = 74), The Angle Orthodontist (n = 15), and European Journal of Orthodontics (n = 11). Since 1975, the articles cited 89 to 545 times mainly originated from the United States, and the overwhelming majority of articles were clinical. The most common study design was case series; 40 articles were classified as level IV and 12 as level V evidence. Conclusions: The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics are generally old articles, rarely possessing high-level evidence.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics from 1975 to 2011

Hui

Han

Geng

et al. 2012

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[21][22][23][24] In PubMed only over 100 bibliometric articles were published between 1993 and 2017. Recently, local or country-specific bibliometric analysis have been also reported.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nason et al [14] found that oncology (n=54) and renal transplantation (n=22) were the most common subspecialties where the influential articles in urology had been published. In a study Hennessey et al [23] determined that urooncology (n=51) and renal transplantation (n=20) were the most commonly represented urological subfields in the top 100 cited articles. The common theme of these three researches wasurooncology.…”

Section: Aetiologic/therapeuticmentioning

confidence: 99%

The top 100 cited articles on urological emergencies: A bibliometric analysis

Kazımoğlu

Dokur

2018

Turkish Journal of Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: In this study, we bibliometrically evaluated the top 100 cited articles on urological emergencies published since 1975 with a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary perspective. Material and methods:We obtained the data for this study from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science and PubMed. We determined 360 articles which were related directly or indirectly to urological emergencies between 1975 and 2017 and analyzed retrospectively the top 100 cited articles among these. Results:The mean citation impact factor of the top 100 cited articles was 25.8±50.1 (range: 4-467) between 1991 and 2014. We determined that classical articles were cited for 2588 times and the total number of selfcitations was 23 (0.8%). Highest publication rate per year was in 2006 (n=9). Among the institutions which published ≥2 articles per year University of Texas led the way with 5 articles. The top 100 articles came from 27 countries and 58% of these are from the USA (n=29), the United Kingdom (n=23) and Germany (n=6). For the top 3 journals of the 33 of top 100 articles most frequently cited were published in journals with an impact factor ≥2 namely, Journal of Urology (n=15), British Journal of Urology International (n=13) and Urology (n=5) respectively. The most frequently cited main topics were penile emergencies with 22 articles and acute scrotal problems with 15 articles. Most of the classical articles on urological emergencies were based on clinical researches (n=95) and also we found that the average level of evidence for the top 100 cited articles was 4.16 (range: 1-5). Mostly preferred publishing language was English among this scientific papers (n=90). Conclusion:Although not considered as a completely unbiased and adequate criterion for scientific evaluations, analysis of the top 100 cited articles provides us with important current data on urological emergencies.

show abstract

“…Bu sonuç, en sık atıf alan makalelerin değerlendi-rildiği diğer çalışmalarla da benzerdir. [14][15][16] En sık atıf alan makaleler içinde randomize kontrollü ça-lışmaların az olmasının sebebi, yapılmasının zor ve maliyetli olması, geniş hasta sayılarına ulaşılama-ması ve ayrıca, bu tip çalışmaların daha çok son yıl-larda yapılması ve bu nedenle yeterli atıf alamaması olarak bildirilmektedir. 13 Çalışmamızda, çalışma yapılan merkezlerin büyük çoğunluğunun Türkiye'nin üç büyük kentinden ve üniversite hastanelerinden olduğu gö-rüldü.…”

Section: Yazarunclassified