2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(03)00961-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The TNM staging system and breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 There is general agreement that prognostic evaluation in breast cancer should be based on prognostic indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 There is general agreement that prognostic evaluation in breast cancer should be based on prognostic indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinicopathologic features of the patients were also recorded. The histologic types and grades of the primary tumors were determined according to a system based on a modification of the WHO classification (25) and the modified Bloom-Richardson grading scheme (26), respectively, whereas the staging of breast cancer was defined according to the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system (27). ER and PR status was analyzed by immunohistochemical staining, and HER2/neu oncoprotein staining was evaluated by the standard HercepTest procedure (Dako 5204).…”
Section: Tissue Samples Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this time, however, the classification has changed substantially. In 2003, the 6th Edition of the TNM classification was established [1][2][3][4]. The prognostic relevance of the T category is a constant factor in regard to the current and past classification [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%