1929
DOI: 10.1016/s0035-9203(29)90849-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ˦tiology of the Tsutsugamushi disease and tropical typhus in the Federated Malay States. Part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1931
1931
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If, according to Havens, this heat-lability is not often met with in American typhus sera, absence of globulin changes is to be suspected as the most likely reason for this additional peculiarity of the American variety of typhus. This would account for Wilson's statement that Mexican typhus sera do not agglutinate U2, an observation which accords with the results shown in Table VIII. The same explanation suggests itself for the difference in reaction to B. agglutinabilis U2 established by Fletcher, Lesslar and Lewthwaite (1929) of the two serological varieties of tropical typhus occurring in the Federated Malay States. They found the agglutination reaction with U2 positive in the urban "W" form of tropical typhus, which corresponds to the X 19 type of B. proteus X, but negative with the rural "K" form of the disease, which is related to the Kingsbury type of B. proteus X. I have failed to confirm the conclusion arrived at by these workers, that the agglutination reaction with U2 affords an additional distinction between the two forms of tropical typhus.…”
Section: Non-specific Stimulation Of Agglutinating Capacity By Hementioning
confidence: 83%
“…If, according to Havens, this heat-lability is not often met with in American typhus sera, absence of globulin changes is to be suspected as the most likely reason for this additional peculiarity of the American variety of typhus. This would account for Wilson's statement that Mexican typhus sera do not agglutinate U2, an observation which accords with the results shown in Table VIII. The same explanation suggests itself for the difference in reaction to B. agglutinabilis U2 established by Fletcher, Lesslar and Lewthwaite (1929) of the two serological varieties of tropical typhus occurring in the Federated Malay States. They found the agglutination reaction with U2 positive in the urban "W" form of tropical typhus, which corresponds to the X 19 type of B. proteus X, but negative with the rural "K" form of the disease, which is related to the Kingsbury type of B. proteus X. I have failed to confirm the conclusion arrived at by these workers, that the agglutination reaction with U2 affords an additional distinction between the two forms of tropical typhus.…”
Section: Non-specific Stimulation Of Agglutinating Capacity By Hementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Apparently these authors have used the customary indologenic strain of X 19. In a recent publication, Fletcher, Lesslar and Lewthwaite (1929), discussing the differential diagnosis between scrub typhus and tsutsugamushi disease in the Federated Malay States, state that, A...the agglutination reaction with the non-indologenic strain of B. proteus, known as the Kingsbury strain, also serves to separate scrub-typhus from the tsutsugamushi disease, because the titre of agglutination is far higher in the former than in the latter; at the same time this test shows the close relationship of the two fevers, because tsutsugamushi is the only disease, except scrub-typhus, in which the blood has been found to agglutinate the Kingsbury strain in dilutions higher than 1 in 200...." The highest titre Fletcher found in three out of seven cases was stated to be 1 in 240.…”
Section: Review Of Earlier Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these represent newly recognized agents closely related to O. tsutsugamushi , such as “ Candidatus Orientia chuto” [4]. Although from the early 20th-century, scrub typhus was recognized and reported locally, it was not until the 1920s that the agents of various typhus-like rickettsial diseases began to be clearly differentiated [6,7]. For scrub typhus, this was due in part to the introduction of the Weil–Felix test and particularly to the fortuitous discovery in 1926 of the OX-K (Kingsbury) strain of Proteus mirabilis as a serological antigen [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although from the early 20th-century, scrub typhus was recognized and reported locally, it was not until the 1920s that the agents of various typhus-like rickettsial diseases began to be clearly differentiated [6,7]. For scrub typhus, this was due in part to the introduction of the Weil–Felix test and particularly to the fortuitous discovery in 1926 of the OX-K (Kingsbury) strain of Proteus mirabilis as a serological antigen [6]. This antigen differentiates scrub typhus from typhus cases caused by other rickettsiae (i.e., epidemic or louse-borne typhus, caused by Rickettsia prowazekii, or endemic, murine or shop typhus associated with R. typhi , formerly referred to as R. mooseri ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation