2015
DOI: 10.1177/0009922815584927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Timing of Infant Food Introduction in Families With a History of Atopy

Abstract: Variation in timing of food introduction may reflect cultural preferences and/or previous experience with food allergy, as well as the ambiguous state of current recommendations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, foods may be introduced later to children who are already allergic [27,47,48] or have a family history of allergy [47,49]. However, we found no indications of reverse causation in our study based on a questionnaire sent to the parents in retrospect and, thus, we did not perform additional analyses on this matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Hence, foods may be introduced later to children who are already allergic [27,47,48] or have a family history of allergy [47,49]. However, we found no indications of reverse causation in our study based on a questionnaire sent to the parents in retrospect and, thus, we did not perform additional analyses on this matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…7,12,15,28 Challenges have emerged for screening implementation, including delays in screening and concerns about low compliance to early introduction among parents. 13,14 There has also been confusion as to the definition of ''high-risk infants,'' as well as what is categorized as a positive test result if screened. 29 Health economic analyses of screening high-risk infants for peanut and egg allergy indicate that screening before introduction of peanut could cost US$654,115,322 or even more if egg screening is included, and recommend a no-screening approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Some countries, such as the United States, recommend prior screening for food sensitization in high-risk infants 12 ; however, screening poses logistical challenges, as well as a risk of delaying peanut introduction because of screening delays. 13,14 By contrast, Australian guidelines do not recommend screening before peanut introduction. 7,15 There are no data on the subsequent effect of either of these approaches on peanut introduction or peanut reactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of concern is that only egg allergy and not any other food allergy was considered as a risk factor. This is important given little historical evidence children <6 months of age have robust enough routine dietary egg exposure for there to be an appreciable rate of clinical egg allergy (as opposed to having egg sensitization) . Other limitations of the LEAP study applicable to our secondary analysis were that skin test cutoffs, dose/duration of the study, and use of skin testing were chosen a priori and were neither randomized nor controlled, and the study sample is clustered as it was obtained at a single food allergy referral center in the UK, and that we have no data available for outcomes of children older than 11 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%