2019
DOI: 10.1111/head.13624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Three T's of NDPH (How Clinical Observations Have Led to Improved Treatment Outcomes)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The triggers of NDPH have garnered interest as to their particular relevance. Our cohort had a lower proportion of triggering events, which may have been elucidated with more in-depth scrutiny (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The triggers of NDPH have garnered interest as to their particular relevance. Our cohort had a lower proportion of triggering events, which may have been elucidated with more in-depth scrutiny (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NDPH has two subtypes: a self-limiting subtype that typically resolves within several months without therapy and a refractory subtype that is resistant to aggressive treatment regimens [1]. Vanast first found that 78 % of patients became headache-free by 24 months [21] and considered NDPH a benign headache. In contrast, most subsequent studies considered it to be the most refractory to treatment and can persist for many years [2].…”
Section: Treatment and Prognosis Of Ndphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Rozen described three “Ts” (trigger, Trendelenburg response, and thunderclap headache) on history and examination to further characterize the NDPH subtype, need for more work-up, pathophysiologic suspicion, and the treatment plan. 71 NPDH can sometimes present initially as a thunderclap headache, in which case RCVS has to be considered. 59 Persistent headache after the thunderclap headache at the onset of RCVS has been observed, and nimodipine may help in those cases.…”
Section: Definition and Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%