2005
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The three-dimensional flight of red-footed boobies: adaptations to foraging in a tropical environment?

Abstract: In seabirds a broad variety of morphologies, flight styles and feeding methods exist as an adaptation to optimal foraging in contrasted marine environments for a wide variety of prey types. Because of the low productivity of tropical waters it is expected that specific flight and foraging techniques have been selected there, but very few data are available. By using five different types of high-precision miniaturized logger (global positioning systems, accelerometers, time depth recorders, activity recorders, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(86 reference statements)
1
96
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Boobies are well known to display a reversed sexual dimorphism (Nelson 1978), and several studies have found sex differences in foraging behaviour in several species (Lewis et al 2005, Zavalaga et al 2007, Weimerskirch et al 2009a and have suggested that they are related to the extent that sexual dimorphism exists for some foraging features, such as dive depths or foraging duration, or to different roles in parental investment. The only significant difference was the slightly longer foraging range of males versus females, a trend found in other species of boobies (Weimerskirch et al 2005(Weimerskirch et al , 2009a. These results suggest that in the case of abundant food, such as Peruvian anchovies in the HCS, sex-specific differences in foraging behaviour do not occur.…”
Section: Sex-specific Differencesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Boobies are well known to display a reversed sexual dimorphism (Nelson 1978), and several studies have found sex differences in foraging behaviour in several species (Lewis et al 2005, Zavalaga et al 2007, Weimerskirch et al 2009a and have suggested that they are related to the extent that sexual dimorphism exists for some foraging features, such as dive depths or foraging duration, or to different roles in parental investment. The only significant difference was the slightly longer foraging range of males versus females, a trend found in other species of boobies (Weimerskirch et al 2005(Weimerskirch et al , 2009a. These results suggest that in the case of abundant food, such as Peruvian anchovies in the HCS, sex-specific differences in foraging behaviour do not occur.…”
Section: Sex-specific Differencesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The annotation of behaviours was based on 2 input variables: the speed and the turning angle, obtained from successive locations. First, all tracks were linearly interpolated with 1 location every 2 min and the maximum speed was set to 90 km h −1 (Weimerskirch et al 2005b). Each location was clustered by the algorithm into 4 behaviour categories (Table 2): High velocity/Low turn (HL), High velocity/High turn (HH), Low velo city/Low turn (LL), Low velocity/High turn (LH).…”
Section: Track Parameters and Behaviour Labellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…breed and forage in a wide range of habitats, from coastal upwelling environments to a gradient of tropical and subtropical environments. Although all booby species generally have a limited foraging range when breeding (Weimerskirch et al 2005a, 2009c, Zavalaga et al 2008, 2010, Ludynia et al 2010, tropical boobies are also unable to dive deeper than a few meters (Lewis et al 2005, Weimerskirch et al 2005b. Consequently, tropical boobies rarely have access to their prey, and require subsurface marine predators such as tunas or dolphins to force prey towards the surface to enable capture (Au & Pitman 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%