2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Third Us Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog (Ucac3)

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
152
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
152
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5 ± 3.5. These results are in agreement with those derived by T2014 (PA=17 Zacharias et al 2010) when including the ∼0″ .1 astrometric uncertainty from our ALMA Cycle 0 observations and the 0″ .06 uncertainty from our input coordinates (2MASS catalog, Cutri et al 2003). We corrected for this offset in our analysis of the disk.…”
Section: Disk Orientationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5 ± 3.5. These results are in agreement with those derived by T2014 (PA=17 Zacharias et al 2010) when including the ∼0″ .1 astrometric uncertainty from our ALMA Cycle 0 observations and the 0″ .06 uncertainty from our input coordinates (2MASS catalog, Cutri et al 2003). We corrected for this offset in our analysis of the disk.…”
Section: Disk Orientationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4.2) and published proper motion (UCAC3, Zacharias et al 2010) agrees well with the velocity of the young disc population of the Galaxy (see Moór et al 2006, Fig. 1.…”
Section: Age Estimates Of the Systemsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…All stars are matched with the UCAC3 catalog (Zacharias et al 2010) in order to assign equatorial coordinates and to adjust instrumental magnitudes to a standard magnitude system. The astrometric calibration achieves an average residual of 0.23 arcsec.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%