2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-6256/151/5/110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE BERLIN EXOPLANET SEARCH TELESCOPE II CATALOG OF VARIABLE STARS. II. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CoRoT SRc02 FIELD

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…step were included. We note that the typical precision of our light curves is comparable to that of recent studies for the search of exoplanets from space (Nascimbeni et al 2012) or from the ground (Klagyivik et al 2016).…”
Section: Light Curves Productionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…step were included. We note that the typical precision of our light curves is comparable to that of recent studies for the search of exoplanets from space (Nascimbeni et al 2012) or from the ground (Klagyivik et al 2016).…”
Section: Light Curves Productionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The need for visual inspection of candidate variables is common for all types of variability search (e.g. Bernard et al 2010;Cusano et al 2013;Abbas et al 2014;Ramsay et al 2014;Klagyivik et al 2016;Pawlak et al 2016). The underlying problem is that corrupted measurements cannot be reliably identified in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is always applied when one aims to produce a clean list of variable stars (e.g. Pawlak et al 2016;Klagyivik et al 2016;Salinas et al 2018;Jayasinghe et al 2018) rather than a (more extensive, but contaminated) list of candidate variables (e.g. Oelkers et al 2018;Heinze et al 2018).…”
Section: An Overview Of Variability Detection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%