The Thin Ice of Civilization

Abstract

It is widely accepted that as time passes, the more we progress as both a species and as individual human beings; the more we progress, the more civilized we become individually and collectively; the more civilized we become, the further we are removed from the vestiges of savagery and barbarism. But is this really the case? It is also generally accepted that civilization is a good thing, both in terms of a process and as a destination. The markers and trappings of civilization-social organization, urbanization, competent government, the rule of law, the arts, material well-being, and so on-are seen as desirable and much preferred to the absence thereof. But what is the cost of this progress? And is civilization sustainable? Some years ago it was also suggested that there is a direct relationship between civilization (both the process and the state of being) and the proliferation of increasingly lethal armed conflict. This article takes a closer look at these troubling issues in light of the current state of affairs of our world and wonders whether it might not be time to rethink and reframe what is meant by civilization.

Organizational learning—COVID-19 experience: innovative global practices for improving patient care in crisis response

“…The argument has often been made that progress leads to a more civilized society-that civilization allows humans to progress, both as a species and as individuals (1). Still, some argue civilization comes at an unsustainable cost attributed to the limitations of urbanization, competent government, social organization, and allocation of resources and human wellbeing.…”