2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The thermal impact of subsurface building structures on urban groundwater resources – A paradigmatic example

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
16
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(35 reference statements)
3
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The high mean AHI and standard deviation of the LUC 'city' stand out and reflect the significant, yet variable impact of the different subclasses and of the corresponding heat sources. High GWT in city centres are due to the interference and superposition of heat input by sealed surfaces and underground structures, as already described in several SUHI studies [23,36,38,40,41,56,[61][62][63][64]. A conspicuous cluster of wells showing increased GWT were observed close to underground car parks and therefore, classified as separate subclasses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high mean AHI and standard deviation of the LUC 'city' stand out and reflect the significant, yet variable impact of the different subclasses and of the corresponding heat sources. High GWT in city centres are due to the interference and superposition of heat input by sealed surfaces and underground structures, as already described in several SUHI studies [23,36,38,40,41,56,[61][62][63][64]. A conspicuous cluster of wells showing increased GWT were observed close to underground car parks and therefore, classified as separate subclasses.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Multiple previous studies on SUHIs indicated local hot spots within dense urban areas and industrial sites, which is also evident in our current findings here. Epting et al [41], Menberg et al [23] and Ferguson and Woodbury [55] noticed a strong correlation between the highest underground temperatures and the density of buildings, in particular buildings with heated basements. For the city centre of Cologne and Winnipeg, Zhu et al [56] found an increase in GWT of up to 5K, which compares closely with the median of the AHI max of artificial surfaces in this study (figure S9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heated basements of buildings or similar infrastructure are apparently the most important source of underground heat in urban areas. Air temperatures within such infrastructure can fluctuate annually between 13 °C and 27 °C (Menberg et al ; Attard et al ; Kupfersberger et al ; Epting et al ). The resulting heat flux into the ground, which would be highest within a dynamic flow system, would depend on the depth of the basement foundation below the water table, and on the groundwater flow velocity (Kupfersberger et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike meteorological phenomena, which have a large discontinuity, groundwater acting as an intermediate medium to surface water is relatively slow in moving and is relatively less sensitive to changes in external factors [12]. Human activities and artificial construction can affect the groundwater system (e.g., recharge, flow paths, water quality [13][14][15]); however, if the anthropogenic influence is not significant, the groundwater level (GWL) displays a periodicity, such as daily, seasonal, or annual change [16][17][18][19], in addition, GWLs can also response to longer teleconnections and climate variability at multiannual, decadal, or longer time scales [20]. It experiences long-term trends of several hours to several months, depending on the depth and aquifer characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%