The thermal effects of skeletal fixation-pin insertion in bone.

Matthews, Larry S.; Green, C A; Goldstein, Steve A.N.

doi:10.2106/00004623-198466070-00015

Cited by 140 publications

(91 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Cooling the drilling region with water at 5 • C was sufficient to carry away most of the heat generated at the drill/bone interface and may be the choice for surgeons when drilling hard portions of bones. The results obtained in this study matched the data obtained in other experimental and numerical studies on bone drilling [10,19,27,28].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

In-vitro experimental analysis and numerical study of temperature in bone drilling

Alam

Khan

Muhammad

et al. 2015

THC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

In-vitro experimental analysis and numerical study of temperature in bone drilling

Alam

Khan

Muhammad

et al. 2015

THC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Radiographic appearance of thermal necrosis as ring sequestrum. Image obtained following in vitro testing of human cadaveric tibiae (Matthews, Green et al 1984) …”

Section: Thermonecrosis and Failure Of Implant Fixationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Drilling of Bone: Practicality, Limitations and Complications Associated with Surgical Drill-Bits

Bertollo¹,

Walsh²

2011

Biomechanics in Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Although we have used a higher drilling speed, this difference would not result in significant temperature elevation, as was previously demonstrated. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The duration of drilling in our experiment was <5 s which is shorter than the 30 s critical exposure reported by Lundskog. 22 Moreover, the thickness of rat cortical bone at distal femoral sites (1 mm) is much thinner than the thickness of human cortical bone.…”

Section: Surgical Preparation Of Bone-scaffold Interfacementioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical preparation of bone–scaffold interface is critical for bone regeneration inside tissue engineering scaffold

Roshan-Ghias

Pioletti

2010

Journal Orthopaedic Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this study was to investigate if the preparation of implantation site affects bone formation inside tissue engineering scaffolds. For this purpose, two different drilling techniques were used to create a hole in distal femurs of rats before the insertion of a bone scaffold: a manually driven wood drill bit and an electrically driven metal drill bit. The size and the position of the hole were identical for the two cases. The bone volume, bone mineral density, and callus formation were assessed noninvasively using micro-CT tomography at several time points after implantation. The formation of bone and soft tissue inside scaffold were evaluated by histology. The bone structure around the holes made by the two techniques was compared ex vivo. The long-term study of bone formation showed that when a wood drill bit was used, the bone formation is accelerated by 3 weeks compared to when a metal drill bit was used. The ex vivo studies suggest that this result is due to the drilling methods differentially affecting the structure of the bone surrounding the generated defects. ß

show abstract

The thermal effects of skeletal fixation-pin insertion in bone.

Cited by 140 publications

References 9 publications

In-vitro experimental analysis and numerical study of temperature in bone drilling

In-vitro experimental analysis and numerical study of temperature in bone drilling

Drilling of Bone: Practicality, Limitations and Complications Associated with Surgical Drill-Bits

Surgical preparation of bone–scaffold interface is critical for bone regeneration inside tissue engineering scaffold

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About