1931
DOI: 10.1088/0959-5309/43/2/308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The theory of the microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1932
1932
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, for a given vertical position of the objective lens with respect to the sample, only molecules located close to the objective focal plane are (approximately) in focus in the tube lens' image plane. The typical vertical distance from the focal plane over which a molecule can be considered approximately in focus (the depth of field) is given by [95,96]:…”
Section: (A) Wide Field Imaging Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, for a given vertical position of the objective lens with respect to the sample, only molecules located close to the objective focal plane are (approximately) in focus in the tube lens' image plane. The typical vertical distance from the focal plane over which a molecule can be considered approximately in focus (the depth of field) is given by [95,96]:…”
Section: (A) Wide Field Imaging Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such systems are deemed as ''superresolution'' since they can surpass the diffraction limit. Axial resolution (i.e., the resolution of objects along the z-axis) is much more difficult to define, and a number of formulae have been offered (Shillaber, 1944;Françon, 1961;Martin, 1966;Piller, 1977). Here, we use the formula for depth of field from Inoue and Spring (1997): Depth of field ¼ l 0 n N:A: 2 þ n M Â N:A: e where l 0 is the wavelength of light (emission wavelength in the case of fluorescence), n is the lowest refractive index, M is the lens magnification, and e is the resolution of the detector (for example, the pixel spacing of the camera).…”
Section: Optical Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of the total DOF has been thoroughly discussed in the last several decades. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Although a standard method of determining the total DOF has not been established to date, the following method is the most recommended in this field to compute total DOF, which is the sum of the diffractive and geometric DOF: [11][12][13][14] …”
Section: Theoretical Analysis Of Dofmentioning
confidence: 99%