1978
DOI: 10.1017/s0018246x00000637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Theory and Practice of the English Leisure Classes

Abstract: This bag of books about grandees and gentry, peers and plutocrats, servants and society is reminiscent of a bundle reviewed by Prof. Spring sixteen years ago. 1 Inevitably, books gathered together for such a purpose tend to be collected on a somewhat haphazard basis. But this particular comparison reveals much about developments in the historiography of the English upper classes over the last decade and a half. Apart from a few tantalizing articles, published work on the aristocracy by historians had hardly ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Benić Penava & Matušić, 2012, p. 77) Dubrovnik's isolation from the main transport system created a unique situation where the political and wealthy classes would find this isolation of the elite resorts attractive, whereas at the same time it was difficult for the less wealthy to travel to Dubrovnik. Despite the extensive research on the leisure class in the western world (Burke, 1995;Cannadine, 1978;Cunningham, 2016;MacCannell, 1999;Munt, 1994;Roberts, 1997;Veblen, 2017) there is a misconception that the consumption of tourism and leisure was incompatible with communist ideals because "tourism appears at odds with a Marxist ideology that stressed egalitarianism and collective sacrifice in pursuit of a classless Utopia" (Rosenbaum, 2015, p. 158). However, travelling for leisure was subsidised and actively promoted by communist states such as the Soviet Union and the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (part of which Croatia/Dubrovnik were) (Rosenbaum, 2015).…”
Section: Historical Context Of Tourism Development and Overtourism Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Benić Penava & Matušić, 2012, p. 77) Dubrovnik's isolation from the main transport system created a unique situation where the political and wealthy classes would find this isolation of the elite resorts attractive, whereas at the same time it was difficult for the less wealthy to travel to Dubrovnik. Despite the extensive research on the leisure class in the western world (Burke, 1995;Cannadine, 1978;Cunningham, 2016;MacCannell, 1999;Munt, 1994;Roberts, 1997;Veblen, 2017) there is a misconception that the consumption of tourism and leisure was incompatible with communist ideals because "tourism appears at odds with a Marxist ideology that stressed egalitarianism and collective sacrifice in pursuit of a classless Utopia" (Rosenbaum, 2015, p. 158). However, travelling for leisure was subsidised and actively promoted by communist states such as the Soviet Union and the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (part of which Croatia/Dubrovnik were) (Rosenbaum, 2015).…”
Section: Historical Context Of Tourism Development and Overtourism Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%