1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4998-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: a case study of dominance effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stress feet can be constructed left-to-right or right-to-left. However, Hayes (1995:265) Finally, another indication of a right-left asymmetry in stress systems is that "dominant" affixes, which have been discussed by Inkelas (1996Inkelas ( , 1998, Alderete (2001a,b), and others, are much more likely to be suffixes than prefixes.…”
Section: Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress feet can be constructed left-to-right or right-to-left. However, Hayes (1995:265) Finally, another indication of a right-left asymmetry in stress systems is that "dominant" affixes, which have been discussed by Inkelas (1996Inkelas ( , 1998, Alderete (2001a,b), and others, are much more likely to be suffixes than prefixes.…”
Section: Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External prefixes (as in the B4 paradgim gidel -megadel -ye-gadel 'to raise Past -Participle -Future'), are attributed to a constraint FAITHSYLLSTEM, which requires the preservation of the syllabic structure of the input stem (recall that the input is a surface representation, and thus includes a syllabic structure). FAITHSYLLSTEM and WORDMIN often compete with each other, and the data suggest the existence of co-phonologies (Inkelas 1998, Anttila 2002, i.e. that in some configurations FAITHSYLLSTEM outranks WORDMIN, and in others WORDMIN outranks FAITHSYLLSTEM.…”
Section: Prosodic Structure : Syllablesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, they can be specified for entire morphological collocations, as in co-phonologies (Orgun 1996, Inkelas 1998), or as a property of individual morphemes (Benua 2000, Itô & Mester 1999, Pater 2000. Clearly, stem classes are necessary, as in lexical stratification in general, because a stem differs precisely in the reduplication pattern it exhibits.…”
Section: Encoding Multiple Patterns In the Same Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not directly predicted by them, the principle of fixed markedness hierarchies is also consistent with alternative models of multiple output patterns and exceptions. For example, co-phonologies and morphologies provide analyses of multiple output patterns by associating potentially distinct constraint rankings with constructions (Antilla 2002, Inkelas 1998, Orgun 1996. This approach can be consistent with (16) by assuming that the constraint rankings associated with distinct constructions obey the principal of fixed markedness hierarchies.…”
Section: Encoding Multiple Patterns In the Same Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%