2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-014-9255-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduplication in Hawaiian: variations on a theme of minimal word

Abstract: Abstract. The article explores a database of over 1600 reduplicated words in Hawaiian and gives the first comprehensive account of the empirical generalizations concerning reduplicant form and associated vowel length alternations. We argue that the observed output patterns and length alternations can be cogently analyzed by recognizing a minimal word target for reduplicant shape. Realizing a minimal word, or a single well-formed foot, is predicted by the integration of standard constraints on prosodic well-for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total reduplication in Acehnese is very straightforward because the reduplicant is generally identical to the stem. This is the characteristic of reduplication in Austronesian languages such as Hawaiian (Alderete & MacMillan, 2015), Papapana (Smith, 2016), Isbukun Bunun (Lin, 2019), and Palembang (Alsamadani & Taibah, 2019), as well as other language families such as Indo-European languages (Rácová & Samko, 2015;Yates & Zukoff, 2018). Acehnese allows open and closed syllables, and no coda deletion has been found in reduplicants.…”
Section: Total Reduplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total reduplication in Acehnese is very straightforward because the reduplicant is generally identical to the stem. This is the characteristic of reduplication in Austronesian languages such as Hawaiian (Alderete & MacMillan, 2015), Papapana (Smith, 2016), Isbukun Bunun (Lin, 2019), and Palembang (Alsamadani & Taibah, 2019), as well as other language families such as Indo-European languages (Rácová & Samko, 2015;Yates & Zukoff, 2018). Acehnese allows open and closed syllables, and no coda deletion has been found in reduplicants.…”
Section: Total Reduplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to limit these alternations to derived environments only, I make use of output-output faithfulness (OO-FAITH) with recursive evaluation (e.g. Benua 1997), following the treatment of a similar pattern in Hawaiian by Alderete and MacMillan (2015). Since the reduplicant for intensifying reduplication in Rapa Nui is exactly two moras in length, I posit a constraint RED = FT for convenience.…”
Section: The Correspondence Approach To Reduplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original development of these representations was mainly driven by considerations from stress typology. However, feet also found use in accounting for prosodic morphology, prosodic minimality, reduplication, locus of infixation, truncation, and templatic and root-and-pattern morphology (Broselow 1982;Prince 1986, 1993b;Itô 1990;Mester 1990Mester , 1994Poser 1990;Spring 1990;Crowhurst 1991Crowhurst , 1994Wiese 2001;Bat-El 2005;Alderete and MacMillan 2015). In addition, binary feet have been invoked to describe the domain for a variety of phonological processes (Nespor and Vogel 1986;Dresher and Lahiri 1991;Halle and Kenstowicz 1991;Rice 1992;Kenstowicz 1993;Mester 1994;Hayes 1995;Bennett 2012).…”
Section: Successes and A Challenge For Binary Feetmentioning
confidence: 99%