In this study, we observed a combinatorial relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic muscles to extend the distal phalanx via the terminal tendon of the finger extensor. Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaver digit rays were used in these experiments (four index, four middle, three ring digits). All fingers had full joint motion without degenerative diseases. Fingers were individually mounted in a custom built jig fixed by a 1-mm Kirschner wire that was driven into the rotational center of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) and proximal interphalangeal joints. Loads were applied to the extensor digit and dorsal interosseous tendons without flexor tendons, via sutures attached over low-friction pulleys. Extension forces that crossed the DIP joint were measured by a force transducer coupled with a materials-testing machine. We observed a steep inclination of the extensor forces produced by the intrinsic muscles, and there were no significant differences in comparisons among loads (200, 400, 600, and 800 g). The inclination slope increased with an increase of load (p < 0.001). Additionally, the inclinations of the non-linear phases among all finger types were not statistically different. Thus, the contribution between the extrinsic and intrinsic muscles in providing extensor forces to the distal phalanx was similar. Keywords: terminal tendon; distal interphalangeal joint; extrinsic muscle; intrinsic muscleThe terminal tendon (TT) is the most distal portion of the extensor mechanism near the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint. Specifically, the TT inserts into the distal base of the distal phalanx. The normal extension function of the TT is dependent on its component extrinsic and intrinsic muscles.1 Injuries to the TT can lead to digital deformities, such as mallet finger, which is caused by a disturbance of the joint balance that is maintained by the forces of the extrinsic and intrinsic muscles. Additionally, flexion and hyperextension deformities of the DIP joint are components of swan neck and boutonniere deformities.Tendinous mallet finger due to closed disruption of the TT is typically treated nonsurgically with extension splinting of the DIP joint. Extension splinting has been reported to be effective even when treatment commences several months after injury.2 The most logical option for surgical reconstruction of chronic mallet finger involves extensor tendon scar excision and direct repair of the extensor tendon. Unfortunately, after the operation, full extension of the DIP joint may not be possible. Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism with a tendon graft (spiral oblique retinacular ligament reconstruction) has been reported to be successful, but it is a somewhat technically demanding procedure.3 A rather simple but elegant procedure devised by Fowler involves rebalancing the extensor mechanism by transecting the insertion of the central slip, 4 thereby transmitting increased extensor force and excursion to the TT. 5 However, every surgical procedure may leave a small extension lag. Even if the ...