1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(92)90633-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The temperature dependent variation of bulk and surface composition of InxGa1−xAs on GaAs grown by chemical beam epitaxy studied by RHEED, X-ray diffraction and XPS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4] This in turn calls for a detailed picture of the interface formation which, up to now, has only been obtained for interfaces between different arsenides, especially AlAs/GaAs and InAs/GaAs. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Indeed, in this case, it is now well established that the interface abruptness is limited by segregation during growth rather than by interdiffusion processes. This has been described successfully by several models based either on an exchange mechanism 7,15 or on diffusion length differences 16,17 at the growth surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[2][3][4] This in turn calls for a detailed picture of the interface formation which, up to now, has only been obtained for interfaces between different arsenides, especially AlAs/GaAs and InAs/GaAs. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Indeed, in this case, it is now well established that the interface abruptness is limited by segregation during growth rather than by interdiffusion processes. This has been described successfully by several models based either on an exchange mechanism 7,15 or on diffusion length differences 16,17 at the growth surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A procedure called 'flash-off' of surface indium atoms after InGaAs QW growth is often adopted to obtain sharp interfaces. A variety of in situ [6][7][8][9] and ex situ [10,11] characterization methods have been used to evaluate the compositional abruptness of the interface. In each case, significant broadening of the interface has been observed and has been attributed to the surface segregation of indium atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more 'square-like' bottom (In-GaAs on GaAs) interface can be obtained by predeposition of a thin indium layer just before the InGaAs growth, while a more 'square-like' top (AlGaAs on InGaAs) interface can be performed by 'flash off' of the surface indium population just after the InGaAs growth. A variety of in situ techniques such as Auger electron spectroscopy [8], x-ray photoemission spectroscopy [9], secondary-ion mass spectroscopy [10], and reflection high-energy electron diffraction [11], as well as ex situ techniques including photoluminescence (PL) [12,13] and high-resolution electron micrography [14], have been employed to evaluate the compositional abruptness of the InGaAs-(Al)GaAs interface. In each case, a significant compositional broadening of the interface was observed and attributed to the surface segregation of indium atoms during growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%