“…Colaço and Silva (2016) did not recognize the taxonomic changes introduced by Duellman et al (2016), stressing that these authors ignored most of the data presented by Faivovich (2002). Conte et al (2016), Lourenço et al (2016Lourenço et al ( , 2019Lourenço et al ( , 2020, Rodrigues et al (2017), Faivovich et al (2018, Ron et al (2018), Baldo et al (2019), Barreto et al (2019), Dubois et al (2021), Lacerda et al (2021), Pezzuti et al (2021), and Segalla et al (2021) also considered Julianus and Ololygon junior synonyms of Scinax. In light of the shortcomings of the generic arrangement within Scinaxini proposed by Duellman et al (2016) that hinder its application, as well as its limited adoption in subsequent taxonomic studies, we follow recent authors in employing Scinax sensu Faivovich et al (2005) below and propose a revised taxonomy on the basis of our results (see "An evidence-based taxonomy of Scinaxini", below).…”