Abstract:Background
Treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) may cause substantial local and systemic symptomatic morbidities, but many patients have high symptom levels before treatment begins. Knowledge of disease-related (treatment-naive) symptom status would aid evaluation of the symptomatic benefit or burden of HNC therapies.
Methods
We retrospectively examined symptoms, quality of life, and health status reported by HNC patients who were naïve to any treatment. We explored symptoms by anatomical site and correl… Show more
“…A recent study found that HNC patients with lymph node metastases were more likely to report severe pretreatment pain compared to patients without lymph node involvement, and that this was significantly correlated with measures of overall quality of life and increased symptom burden. 4 Pre-treatment pain has been associated with poorer overall survival in patients with HNSCC 18 thus suggesting the need for prompt pain treatment and management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 This study identifies gastrointestinal symptoms as the primary reason for emergency department presentation and one of the primary discharge diagnoses in this population, consistent with known symptoms of head and neck cancer treatment. 4,11,12 Dysphagia (impairment of the swallowing process) is common in patients with HNSCC, and is often underdiagnosed and improperly treated, 13 resulting in dehydration and malnutrition 14 and may necessitate the use of nonoral nutritional support. A recent study aimed at understanding the management and prevention of acute and late effects because of head and neck cancer therapy, in particular, treatment associated effects related to swallowing, suggested that precautions can be taken before, during, and after treatment in order to minimize the impact of dysphagia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 However, these treatments are associated with significant toxicities that compromise patient functionality and quality of life and present significant management challenges for the clinical staff. 2,4 Emergency departments are now a frequent site of care for many patients with cancer. 5 Visiting the emergency department may potentially reflect inadequacy in addressing or managing expected side effects or complications during routine care.…”
Background
Treatments for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) are associated with toxicities that lead to emergency department (ED) presentation.
Methods
We utilized data from an ongoing prospective cohort of newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients (N=298) with HNSCC to evaluate the association between clinical and epidemiologic factors and risk and frequency of ED presentation. Time to event was calculated from the date of treatment initiation to ED presentation, date of death, or current date. Frequency of ED presentation was the sum of ED visits during the follow-up time.
Results
History of hypertension, normal/underweight body mass index (BMI), and probable depression predicted increased risk of ED presentation. BMI and severe pain were associated with higher frequency of ED presentation.
Conclusions
Clinical and epidemiologic factors can help predict HNSCC patients that will present to the ED to improve treatment-related patient outcomes and quality of life.
“…A recent study found that HNC patients with lymph node metastases were more likely to report severe pretreatment pain compared to patients without lymph node involvement, and that this was significantly correlated with measures of overall quality of life and increased symptom burden. 4 Pre-treatment pain has been associated with poorer overall survival in patients with HNSCC 18 thus suggesting the need for prompt pain treatment and management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 This study identifies gastrointestinal symptoms as the primary reason for emergency department presentation and one of the primary discharge diagnoses in this population, consistent with known symptoms of head and neck cancer treatment. 4,11,12 Dysphagia (impairment of the swallowing process) is common in patients with HNSCC, and is often underdiagnosed and improperly treated, 13 resulting in dehydration and malnutrition 14 and may necessitate the use of nonoral nutritional support. A recent study aimed at understanding the management and prevention of acute and late effects because of head and neck cancer therapy, in particular, treatment associated effects related to swallowing, suggested that precautions can be taken before, during, and after treatment in order to minimize the impact of dysphagia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 However, these treatments are associated with significant toxicities that compromise patient functionality and quality of life and present significant management challenges for the clinical staff. 2,4 Emergency departments are now a frequent site of care for many patients with cancer. 5 Visiting the emergency department may potentially reflect inadequacy in addressing or managing expected side effects or complications during routine care.…”
Background
Treatments for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) are associated with toxicities that lead to emergency department (ED) presentation.
Methods
We utilized data from an ongoing prospective cohort of newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients (N=298) with HNSCC to evaluate the association between clinical and epidemiologic factors and risk and frequency of ED presentation. Time to event was calculated from the date of treatment initiation to ED presentation, date of death, or current date. Frequency of ED presentation was the sum of ED visits during the follow-up time.
Results
History of hypertension, normal/underweight body mass index (BMI), and probable depression predicted increased risk of ED presentation. BMI and severe pain were associated with higher frequency of ED presentation.
Conclusions
Clinical and epidemiologic factors can help predict HNSCC patients that will present to the ED to improve treatment-related patient outcomes and quality of life.
“…We defined the symptom burden as the number of severe symptoms rated as 7 on the MDASI's 0 to 10 scale on the basis of results from various studies. 18,20…”
Background
Cancer patients’ symptom burden is commonly attributed to their cancer and its treatment. Increasingly, cancer patients have many other chronic comorbid conditions. However the degree to which these comorbid conditions may contribute to patient-reported symptom burden is unclear.
Methods
We explored the relationship between the presence of comorbid conditions, symptom experience and burden, and perceived bother from cancer or comorbid conditions in 3106 cancer patients. We examined the associations between number of comorbidities (identified based on current medications), patient-reported symptom burden (the number of symptoms scored ≥7 on the 13-item MDASI physical scale), patient-reported bother from comorbid conditions and from cancer (‘not at all’ to ‘extremely’) along with clinician-reported difficulty in caring for patient’s symptoms.
Results
Based on medication lists, 19% patients had at least 5 of 12 comorbid conditions. About 39% rated at least 1 symptom ≥7, and this proportion increased with increasing number of comorbid conditions (48% v 36% for patients with ≥5 v 1 comorbid conditions). One-third of patients reported moderate or worse bother, and this was significantly associated with increased number of comorbid conditions (OR=2.4) and increased symptom burden (OR=1.22). Clinicians ratings of difficulty in managing patients’ symptoms was significantly associated with bother from cancer (OR=2.0), comorbid conditions (OR=1.6), and symptom burden (OR=1.1).
Conclusions
Comorbidity is common in cancer patients and is associated with greater symptom burden and clinician reports of difficulty in managing patients’ symptoms. Greater attention to comorbid conditions is needed to optimize the symptom management of cancer patients with multimorbidity.
“…Commonly, head and neck tumors produce many symptoms and disturbances in patients. In a recent study with 748 head and neck cancer patients, Hanna et al 1 demonstrated that more than 30% of treatment-na€ ıve patients reported moderate to severe symptoms related to sleep disturbances, distress, and fatigue. Gunn et al 2 also demonstrated that specific symptoms related to tasting, swallowing, speech, and mucus in the throat can increase in frequency by three-to seven-fold after treatment.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.