The Sustainable Seafood Movement Is a Governance Concert, with the Audience Playing a Key Role

Abstract

Private standards, including ecolabels, have been posed as a governance solution for the global fisheries crisis. The conventional logic is that ecolabels meet consumer demand for certified "sustainable" seafood, with "good" players rewarded with price premiums or market share and "bad" players punished by reduced sales. Empirically, however, in the markets where ecolabeling has taken hold, retailers and brands-rather than consumers-are demanding sustainable sourcing, to build and protect their reputation. The aim of this paper is to devise a more accurate logic for understanding the sustainable seafood movement, using a qualitative literature review and reflection on our previous research. We find that replacing the consumer-driven logic with a retailer/brand-driven logic does not go far enough in making research into the sustainable seafood movement more useful. Governance is a "concert" and cannot be adequately explained through individual actor groups. We propose a new logic going beyond consumer-or retailer/brand-driven models, and call on researchers to build on the partial pictures given by studies on prices and willingness-to-pay, investigating more fully the motivations of actors in the sustainable seafood movement, and considering audience beyond the direct consumption of the product in question.

Toward Sustainability of South African Small-Scale Fisheries Leveraging ICT Transformation Pathways

“…'Co-op' hosted collective accounting and asset management functions for small-scale fisher cooperatives, and 'Marketplace' captured small-scale fisher socio-cultural 'stories' on a traceability platform where fishers availed their catch for the Restaurant Supported Fishery (RSF). This 'storied' fish was modelled on the rapidly expanding arena of small-scale fisher direct marketing that facilitates shorter value chains between fishers and schools, hospitals, restaurants and homes [46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. At the time of writing, the most active modules were the Abalobi 'Fisher' and 'Marketplace' modules, with 'Monitor', 'Manager' and 'Co-op' in development.…”

Social networks and seafood sustainability governance: Exploring the relationship between social capital and the performance of fishery improvement projects

“…Indeed, private philanthropic foundations, environmental NGOs and supply chains have become active participants in the governance of fisheries through private approaches such as certification and FIPs. As such, the sustainable seafood movement is governed by a network of actors working together to influence fisheries sustainability, giving rise to a more decentralized and networked form of governance where both public and private actors play, what has been deemed a governance 'concert' (Barclay & Miller, 2018;Gutiérrez & Morgan, 2017)…”

The role of corporate social responsibility in creating a Seussian world of seafood sustainability

“…Coming back around to the idea of socio‐technical imaginaries (Jasanoff & Kim, ), it is likely harder to keep up the imaginary façade, as the number of participants increases; maintaining a Seussian world means continuing to keep sustainable seafood the purview of the few. Yet seafood sustainability is a “governance concert” (Barclay & Miller, ), and probably a symphony if it is to be at its best. Moving into the post‐Seussian seafood sustainability era will therefore require all hands on deck to ensure that seafood CSR delivers in reality.…”