Social networks and seafood sustainability governance: Exploring the relationship between social capital and the performance of fishery improvement projects

Abstract

In the early 2000s, the sustainable seafood movement put forward the concept of fishery improvement projects (FIP), a structured multi‐stakeholder approach to address environmental challenges in a fishery and aims to use the power of the market to incentivize change. The intent of the FIP model is to allow fisheries that currently do not meet the MSC standard to maintain market access while working on credible improvements. As such, FIPs have become a widely promoted approach to sustainable fisheries and have proliferated around the globe. Based on recent research assessing the impact of FIPs and testing various FIP attributes and their link to FIP performance, it seems that the FIP model may be delivering on its promise overall. However, the impact of FIP are at best based correlation rather than causation, with only few FIP attributes having been measured consistently over a significant period of time. In this theoretical contribution, we bring attention to one attribute of FIPs: the structure of their social network and its implication for social capital and successful collective action. We start by describing FIPs as projects located at the intersection of environmental governance networks and value chain network governance. Secondly, we demonstrate FIPs as complex social networks and the link between network attributes and FIP progress through the concept of social capital. Thirdly, we present the method of social network analysis and relevant network attributes to understand and characterize how FIPs work better. Finally, we suggest opportunities for further research and integration of this approach in planning and designing FIPs. Through this work, we wish to bring attention to one type of FIP attributes that is currently not explicitly being taken into account to current FIP practitioner and researchers. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Drivers in the fisheries domain: A bibliometric and text mining analysis

“…Moreover, Salas and Gaertner [ 17 ] also concluded that knowledge of the social, economic and behavioural dynamics of fishing is essential for effective fisheries management. Over the last few decades, the concept of sustainability has gained limelight in various fields and has been one of the extensively discussed aspects in the fisheries sector [ [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] ]. Likewise, Setthasakko [ 26 ] assessed key determinants that drive corporate sustainability and barriers that hinder its development by selecting two frozen seafood-processing companies as case studies.…”

How bountiful is the ocean? Participatory valuation of human–nature relationships in Yaeyama Islands, Okinawa, Japan

“…In addition, this study applied network analysis as a quantitative content analysis method for the visualization of human-nature relations. Social network analysis has been extensively utilized to examine the relationship between extracted factors and objects related to various types of social capital and natural resource governance (e.g., Barnes et al 2016;Bodin and Crona 2009;Crona and Bodin 2006;Cvitanovic et al 2017;Österblom et al 2017;Packer and Bailey 2020) in the context of environmental and sustainability sciences. However, the network analysis of text data has been utilized outside those disciplines, such as in medical, nursing, and educational applications, as one of the methods for content analysis (Danowski 1993;Osgood 1959).…”

Effect of Social Capital on SMEs Performance: Does Innovation Matter

“…The social capital theory drives on the relationship among networks to achieve access to resources which can take the form of information benefit not accessible to non-members of the network (Tian et al,2019;Packer et al,2020). Entrepreneur's internal network influences financial performance in the process of starting and integrating his business easily and successfully in gathering financial resources to start trading first (Stam et al, 2014;Sforzi and Bianchi, 2020), even outside suppliers may question how new companies' regulation are carried (Stinchcombe, 1965;Akintimehin et al, 2020).…”