2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25477-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sustainable Role of the Tree in Environmental Protection Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction ranged between 35% (Mn) and 52% (Cd). By contrast, Baltrėnaitė et al, (2016), whose focus was uptake by plant tissues only, found that the effectiveness of Birch for the purification of a sewagesludge polluted soil was 0.2-0.3% per year (<4.2% across 14 years) for Mn and Zn but only 0.04-0.07% per year for Cu and Pb (<0.98% across 14 years) while that for Alder reached only 0.01-0.04% per year for Cu, Mn and Pb (<0.6% across 14 years). Clearly, there is more involved in metal decontamination than simply the planted trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The reduction ranged between 35% (Mn) and 52% (Cd). By contrast, Baltrėnaitė et al, (2016), whose focus was uptake by plant tissues only, found that the effectiveness of Birch for the purification of a sewagesludge polluted soil was 0.2-0.3% per year (<4.2% across 14 years) for Mn and Zn but only 0.04-0.07% per year for Cu and Pb (<0.98% across 14 years) while that for Alder reached only 0.01-0.04% per year for Cu, Mn and Pb (<0.6% across 14 years). Clearly, there is more involved in metal decontamination than simply the planted trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…When the BET method for determining the specific biochar surface area was used (see Baltrėnaitė et al, 2016a), the obtained larger value was even higher (about 291 m 2 /g), because this method can access the contribution of micropores, rather than macro-and mesopores in the specific surface area of the material. Although this surface area, similar to that of biochar obtained from the widely known Giant miscanthus (360 m 2 /g) (Lee et al, 2013), is several times smaller than that of activated carbon (although the price of wood biochar can be up to 4 times lower than that of activated carbon [personal communications]), it is considerably higher than that of biochar obtained from some popular bioproducts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties of wood, that can influence the adsorption of metals, include lignin, water content, mineral composition, morphology and pore structure. In comparison to the other types of waste, the woody feedstock results in higher yield of biochar due to higher lignin content (Baltrėnaitė et al 2016b(Baltrėnaitė et al , 2016c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%