Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1981
DOI: 10.2307/2402374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sulphur Content and pH of Rainfall and of Throughfalls Under Pine and Birch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3) suggest that is not the case). Alcock and Morton (1981) reported no enhancement of sulphate deposition in throughfall compared to bulk precipitation under 30-year old Scots pines in a 2-year study near Ascot, only about 30 km distant from the present site, in the years 1975-77. However, this was a dense plantation of young trees with a density of about 1 tree per 4 m 2 .…”
Section: Figure 6 Near Herecontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…3) suggest that is not the case). Alcock and Morton (1981) reported no enhancement of sulphate deposition in throughfall compared to bulk precipitation under 30-year old Scots pines in a 2-year study near Ascot, only about 30 km distant from the present site, in the years 1975-77. However, this was a dense plantation of young trees with a density of about 1 tree per 4 m 2 .…”
Section: Figure 6 Near Herecontrasting
confidence: 57%