Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Mechanisms of Forest Response to Acidic Deposition 1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3364-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Dry Deposition, Pollutant Damage, and Forest Health with Throughfall Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 204 publications
1
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest enrichment ratios of SO4 -2 were in Durango (1.9) and Manzanal (1.9), showing the effect of their closeness to pollution sources. K + had the greatest enrichment ratio in the conifer forests (2.9 in Manzanal and 2.4 in Posadero) which could either come from the cation deposition as it is a common cation in soils (Table III) (Galloway and Likens 1978) or from canopy leaching, a major source of K + in forests (Parker, 1990;Cappellato et al, 1993). The value of pH was never lower than 4.03, this value being recorded in Manzanal in bulk precipitation in April 1994, and the highest pH was in throughfall in Durango in May, 7.18.…”
Section: Bulk Precipitation and Throughfallmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The highest enrichment ratios of SO4 -2 were in Durango (1.9) and Manzanal (1.9), showing the effect of their closeness to pollution sources. K + had the greatest enrichment ratio in the conifer forests (2.9 in Manzanal and 2.4 in Posadero) which could either come from the cation deposition as it is a common cation in soils (Table III) (Galloway and Likens 1978) or from canopy leaching, a major source of K + in forests (Parker, 1990;Cappellato et al, 1993). The value of pH was never lower than 4.03, this value being recorded in Manzanal in bulk precipitation in April 1994, and the highest pH was in throughfall in Durango in May, 7.18.…”
Section: Bulk Precipitation and Throughfallmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This excess of throughfall was uncommon phenomenon, because interception ratio of rainfall by canopy generally ranged from I 3 to 5l Vo (Tsukamoto, 1992). lnthe present site, fols were very common during the rainy season and fog drip may be contributed to the increments of water flux under the canopy, 7-adroga (1981) suggested (1) H* flux generally decreases after passage through the canopy at broadleaved forests (Parker, 1983(Parker, , 1990, but not for the present forest. Fluxes of K*, Mg2*, Cl-, and SOa2-showed significant increment from bulk precipitation to throughfall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Fluxes of K*, Mg2*, Cl-, and SOa2-showed significant increment from bulk precipitation to throughfall. Canopy leaching of K+ and Mg2* was generally observed (e.9., Parker, 1983Parker, , 1990Vitousek & Sanford, 1986). Canopy leaching of Cl-has some debate, but it was suggested in some studies (e.9., Forti & Moreira-Nordemann, l99l; Peters, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berger et al (2001) suggested that half of the cations leached from sugar maple canopies were attributable to the cation-exchange reactions driven by H + in rainfall at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (New Hampshire, USA). Parker (1983Parker ( , 1990) concluded that canopy leaching contributed between 10% and 80% to the total flux of these base cations reaching the forest floor. Qualls et al (1991) reported that highly concentrated dissolved organic matter was leached into rainwater passing through the canopy and forest floor of an oak (Quercus spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%