2016
DOI: 10.4172/2155-6199.1000368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Suitability of Using Vermicomposting for the Stabilization of Septic Tank Waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results agree with the findings of the present study, were high Olsen P was observed in the cow and pig manure RP-enriched treatment with E. fetida only compared to control treatment. In another study, Schaik, et al [55] conducted an experiment, where they investigated the practicality of vermicomposting septic tank waste using E. fetida. In their study, they noticed an increase of Olsen P in all the treatments during vermicomposting, until day 89 after which a steady state was reached.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results agree with the findings of the present study, were high Olsen P was observed in the cow and pig manure RP-enriched treatment with E. fetida only compared to control treatment. In another study, Schaik, et al [55] conducted an experiment, where they investigated the practicality of vermicomposting septic tank waste using E. fetida. In their study, they noticed an increase of Olsen P in all the treatments during vermicomposting, until day 89 after which a steady state was reached.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vermicomposts were produced by the earthworm Eisenia fetida from different combinations of septic tank waste or dairy shed solids (mainly cow manure) with horticultural factory wastes (tomato prunings and palm fibre as bulking agents), as described by Schaik et al (2016). Briefly, 4 different products tested in this study were produced from our previous vermicomposting trial, including (1) a compost from 50% septic tank waste + 40% palm fibre + 10% tomato prunings made without worms (referred to as HS-compost), (2) vermicompost from 50% septic tank waste + 40% palm fibre + 10% tomato prunings + worms (referred to as HS-vermicompost), (3) vermicompost from 30% septic tank waste + 60% palm fibre + 10% tomato prunings + worms (referred to as LS-vermicompost) and (4) vermicompost from 30% cow manure + 60% palm fibre + 10% tomato prunings + worms (referred to as CMvermicompost).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Vermicomposts and The Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concomitant use of several green waste products along with the septic tank wastes will add value to the resultant vermicomposting product, which may make land application or its use in potting media more publicly acceptable. In previous studies, vermicomposting has been shown to produce a stabilized product and reduce or even eliminate pathogen from the wastes (Eastman et al 2001;Monroy et al 2009;Rodríguez-Canché et al 2010;Schaik et al 2016). One likely destination for these stabilized products in New Zealand is the forestry sector, which is characterized both by exotic fast-growing tree species and by natural forests composed of a variety of endemic native tree species, of which some can be used for production purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%