2011
DOI: 10.1177/160940691101000204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Subjectivity Problem: Improving Triangulation Approaches in Metaphor Analysis Studies

Abstract: Metaphor analysis procedures for uncovering participant conceptualizations have been wellestablished in qualitative research settings since the early 1980s; however, one common criticism of metaphor analysis is the trustworthiness of the findings. Namely, accurate determination of the conceptual metaphors held by participants based on the investigation of linguistic metaphors has been identified as a methodological issue because of the subjectivity involved in the interpretation; that is, because they are nece… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
36
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Görüşmelerle elde edilen mecazlar ve mecazlara yüklenen anlamlar aracılığıyla bireylerin olayları nasıl algıladıkları hakkında derinlemesine bilgiler elde edilmektedir (Armstrong, Davis ve Paulson;2011;Jensen, 2006;Yıldırım ve Şimşek, 2005). Bu araştırmada, araştırmacılara şu sorular yöneltilerek mecaz verisi toplanmıştır: "OSB ……………….…”
Section: Veri Toplama Ve Analizunclassified
“…Görüşmelerle elde edilen mecazlar ve mecazlara yüklenen anlamlar aracılığıyla bireylerin olayları nasıl algıladıkları hakkında derinlemesine bilgiler elde edilmektedir (Armstrong, Davis ve Paulson;2011;Jensen, 2006;Yıldırım ve Şimşek, 2005). Bu araştırmada, araştırmacılara şu sorular yöneltilerek mecaz verisi toplanmıştır: "OSB ……………….…”
Section: Veri Toplama Ve Analizunclassified
“…In particular, this case study is limited by the small size of the data set and the lack of data set triangulation with classroom observations. The possibility of interpretive bias, or what Armstrong, Davis, and Paulson (2011) call "the subjectivity problem" (p. 153), is also a study limitation. Because metaphors are "formed through various social and cultural networks" (p. 152) and, thus, function variously across these contexts dependent on an individual's use of the metaphor, Armstrong, Davis, and Paulson stress the importance of having an "intentional plan" for data verification built into the study design to support the researcher's interpretations and reduce bias (p. 153).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metaphor analysis involves collecting and examining the actual spoken or written metaphors used by the participants, known as metaphorical linguistic expressions, in order to identify conceptual metaphors, or the underlying analogic conceptualizations, that can provide insight into participants' understandings of a particular topic (Cameron & Low, 1999;Kovesces, 2002;. While procedures may vary, Armstrong, Davis, and Paulson (2011) reported these steps common to metaphor analysis studies:…”
Section: Data Sources and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study attempted to determine the pre-service music teachers' perceptions of the concept of a "music teaching program" with the use of metaphors. The analysis and interpretation of the metaphorical expressions written by pre-service teachers were conducted in the five-stage process described by Saban (2008): (1) naming, (2) organization (elimination and refinement), (3) category development, (4) establishing validity and reliability, (5) digitization of the data (Armstrong, Davis, & Paulson, 2011;Saban et al, 2006;Saban, 2008). 1) Naming: In this stage, the participants' metaphors were listed, giving a code to each metaphor as well (e.g., computer, grandmother, lighthouse, compass).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%