1972
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1693(00)91778-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of trimethylphenylammonium nonachlorodirhodate(III) and a survey of metal-metal interactions in confacial bioctahedra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
2

Year Published

1973
1973
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Face-sharing biooctahedral complexes of the type L 3 M(m-X) 3 ML 3 form a large and well-studied group of molecules. [56][57][58] However, to our knowledge there are no examples of complexes in which two iron atoms share one O and two S bridging atoms. The Fe 2 (RS) 2 (O) core also reveals a striking asymmetry in the Fe II À OH bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Face-sharing biooctahedral complexes of the type L 3 M(m-X) 3 ML 3 form a large and well-studied group of molecules. [56][57][58] However, to our knowledge there are no examples of complexes in which two iron atoms share one O and two S bridging atoms. The Fe 2 (RS) 2 (O) core also reveals a striking asymmetry in the Fe II À OH bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the octahedral distortion found in the title compound is quite significant, it is not the first example of such large differences in Rh-Clbond lengths. Asimilar situation with even larger Rh-Cl deviation (0.035(3) Å) within the sameoctahedron was found in the structure of bis(1,2-diammoniopropane) hexachloridorhodate(III) chloride [3], whereas the largest linear distortion (difference in Rh-Cl bond lengths of 0.215(16) Å) was reported for the [Rh 2 Cl 9 ] 3-dinuclear anion in the structure of trimethylphenylammonium nonachloridodirhodate(III) [6]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…An interesting comparison can be made between the pair Mo2X3s -(X=CI, Br) on the one hand and the pair Mo2X93-(X=C1,Br) (Saillant et al, 1971) on the other. Both of the nonahalo anions have much longer Mo-Mo distances (2.66, 2.82,~) than their octahalo analogs (2.38, 2.44 A), and according to all criteria (Cotton & Ucko, 1972) have markedly weaker Mo-Mo bonding interactions. The metal-to-halogen bonds in the two sets of compounds are presumably very similar since corresponding bond distances differ very little, except for the Mo-Br(bridge) bond distances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to all the criteria previously proposed (Cotton & Ucko, 1972) for evaluating the nature and magnitude of the direct metal-to-metal interaction in confacial bioctahedra, the Mo-Mo interaction is unquestionably of a bonding nature, but slightly less strong than that in Mo2CI~-. Thus in Mo2C18 a-the Mo-Mo distance is 2.38 (1)~, while in Mo2Br 3-it is 2.439 (7) A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%