2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of planetary nebulae: theory vs. practice

Abstract: Context. This paper is the first in a short series dedicated to the long-standing astronomical problem of de-projecting the bidimensional, apparent morphology of a three-dimensional mass of gas. Aims. We focus on the density distribution in real planetary nebulae (and all types of expanding nebulae). Methods. We introduce some basic theoretical notions, discuss the observational methodology, and develop an accurate procedure for determining the matter radial profile within the sharp portion of nebula in the pl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) resembles that of the optical image of many elliptical PNs, e.g., NGC 6826 (Balick 1987;Balick et al 1998). Cygnus A hot spots, i.e., the heads of the two jets, resemble the structure of pairs of ansae − two opposite dense blobs along the major axis of some elliptical PNs − suggesting that the ansae are formed by jets (see for example the ansae of the PN NGC 7009; Balick 1987;Balick et al 1998;Sabbadin et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…2) resembles that of the optical image of many elliptical PNs, e.g., NGC 6826 (Balick 1987;Balick et al 1998). Cygnus A hot spots, i.e., the heads of the two jets, resemble the structure of pairs of ansae − two opposite dense blobs along the major axis of some elliptical PNs − suggesting that the ansae are formed by jets (see for example the ansae of the PN NGC 7009; Balick 1987;Balick et al 1998;Sabbadin et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Leaving simplistic "modern views" of PN evolution out of consideration, we remark that updated 1D radiationhydrodynamical evolutionary models (Perinotto et al 2004b;Schönberner et al 2005) still partly fail in reproducing the positive expansion velocity gradient of the main shell (the Wilson's law;Wilson 1950;Weedman 1968), and the gas distribution observed in a representative sample of carefully deprojected "true" PNe (Sabbadin et al 2006, and references therein). Such model-PN vs. true-PN discrepancies suggest that the former tend to systematically overestimate the relative importance of wind interaction (as supported by a recent revision downward of mass-loss rates in PN central stars, due to clumping of the fast stellar wind; Kudritzki et al 2006;Prinja et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This factor is known to be relatively small. We assume Vf-s=5 km s −1 (Sabbadin et al, 2006 (Latter et al, 2000). The hot CSPN ionizes the surrounding gases in a shell which can be seen in a (stratified) multiple sub-shell structures of forbidden lines.…”
Section: Line Profile and Shell Expansion Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%