1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1971.tb00752.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure and function of the jaw muscles in the rat (Rattus norvegicus L.)

Abstract: The gross anatomy and internal architecture of the jaw musculature in Rattus norvegicus has been studied using a combination of gross dissection, thick sectioning and histological techniques. As the basis of an examination of the mechanics of the muscles, the following are described:temporal, masseter, internal and external pterygoids, digastric, mylohyoid, geniohyoid and transverse mandibular. On the basis of their anatomy, it is concluded that these muscles form a series of slings around the jaw:a vertical s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
82
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In N. mexicana, the adaptive features of the temporalis muscle are less striking than in arvicoline murid. The origin-insertion relationship of each part of this muscle is basically identical with that of other murid species (Hiiemae and Houston 1971;Weijs 1973;Voss 1988;Iwaku 2004, 2006). Acquisition or enlargement of some aponeuroses, however, increases the fiber attachment area for the anterior part of the temporalis muscle so that a large upward force can be obtained.…”
Section: Muscle Architecturesupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In N. mexicana, the adaptive features of the temporalis muscle are less striking than in arvicoline murid. The origin-insertion relationship of each part of this muscle is basically identical with that of other murid species (Hiiemae and Houston 1971;Weijs 1973;Voss 1988;Iwaku 2004, 2006). Acquisition or enlargement of some aponeuroses, however, increases the fiber attachment area for the anterior part of the temporalis muscle so that a large upward force can be obtained.…”
Section: Muscle Architecturesupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Consequently, Prospaniomys would have presented an intermediate degree of development of masseter posterior between that of the octodontoids and nonoctodontoids caviomorphs, which would suggest a relatively moderate force exerted by this muscle (see Becerra et al 2014). Regarding the digastric muscle, it is classified as a mandibular depressor (Hiiemae 1971;Gorniak 1985;LevTov and Tal 1987); a relatively large size of this muscle could be related to a wide and powerful opening of the mandible (as it is related in Carnivora; see Scapino 1976), which could be linked to the type of diet proposed for Prospaniomys (see next paragraph).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Colors represent habits: white, epigean; gray, fossorial; black, subterranean. Mandibular shape changes along relative warps (RW1, 2, 3), from negative (−) to positive (+) values, are shown as deformation grids for the anterior part of the deep masseter in Hiiemae 1971;Cox et al 2012Cox et al , 2013. A similar function could be regarded for the masseter medialis pars infraorbitalis, although a forward origin for this muscle in Prospaniomys suggests that it could be involved in the generation of uniform forces along the tooth row during chewing, which would be necessary when processing vegetal material .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body size increase to accumulate more resources for survival in harsh environments (Armitage, 1999) may imply morphological remodeling of the entire skeleton; functions could be lost if size changes happened without compensatory adjustments in shape (Emerson and Bramble, 1993). The rodent mandible has been the subject of several morphological and phylogenetic studies (Thorpe et al, 1982;Atchley et al, 1992;Corti et al, 1996;Velhagen and Roth, 1997;Swiderski et al, 1999;Astua de Morales et al, 2000;Duarte et al, 2000;Corti and Rohlf, 2001), with particular attention paid to the relationships between the mandible and the jaw muscles (Hiiemae, 1971a(Hiiemae, , 1971bHiiemae and Houston, 1971;Ball and Roth, 1995;Thorington and Darrow, 1996;Cardini and Tongiorgi, in press). The mandible ontogenesis and the genetic bases of its development also have been investigated (Atchley et al, 1992;Cheverud et al, 1997;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%