1964
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051150107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure and development of the chondrocranium of Varanus. II. The development of the orbito‐temporal region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas a detailed description of the chondrocranial development in V. bengalensis was presented by Shrivastava (1963Shrivastava ( , 1964a, dermatocranial development and particularly the progress of ossification were hardly mentioned. Our paper primarily aims to present a source of embryological information which might be useful for future studies with a comparable comprehensive anatomical approach (Polachowski and Werneburg, 2013).…”
Section: G Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas a detailed description of the chondrocranial development in V. bengalensis was presented by Shrivastava (1963Shrivastava ( , 1964a, dermatocranial development and particularly the progress of ossification were hardly mentioned. Our paper primarily aims to present a source of embryological information which might be useful for future studies with a comparable comprehensive anatomical approach (Polachowski and Werneburg, 2013).…”
Section: G Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The platybasic condition of the skull of reptile embryos does not indicate that the reptile skull is primitively platybasic, as it was suggested by SHRIVASTAVA (1964). It only suggests that the reptile skull goes through an initial platybasic condition because an ancestral skull (at an undetermined level) also went through an initial platybasic condition during ontogeny (which is different from having a platybasic adult skull): Following the criteria ofoutgroup comparison (KLUGE 1976), early ontogenetic stages of various groups of organisms are compared, and this has no impact on the evaluation of character-states in the adult stages of the same groups of organisms.…”
Section: The Significance Of Successive Ontogenetic Stagesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The platybasic condition is observed during the earliest developmental stages of some turtles (Emys: KUNKEL 1912; Chrysemis: SHANER 1926), of crocodiles (Crocodybs: MUEL-LER 1967), of Sphenodon (HOWES and SWINNERTON 1901) and of a few lizards such as Varanus (SHRIVASTAVA, 1964), Ptyodactylus (EL-TOUBI and KAMAL 1961) and Lacerta vivipara (BELLAIRS 1949).…”
Section: The Significance Of Successive Ontogenetic Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both pilae are present in P. apodus in early ontogeny; however, the pila antotica never completely chondrifies, and late in embryogenesis it undergoes reduction. The ontogenetic regression of the pila antotica which takes place in P. apodus, is well documented for other clades of lizards, like gymnophthalmids, 40 skinks, 17,19,41,42 varanids, 43 agamids, 39,44,45 and chamaeleonids, 46,47 too. By extrapolating the developmental traits of the pila accessoria of lacertid lizards [23][24][25][26]48,49 to A. fragilis, the absence of the pila accessoria in the fully formed chondrocranium suggests a complete absence of the pila antotica in this species early in ontogeny.…”
Section: Evolution Of Anguid Chondrocranial Anatomymentioning
confidence: 82%