Developing Models in Science Education 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structure and Development of Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Models: Implications for Teacher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The teaching of models and modelling is especially difficult when teachers lack pedagogical content knowledge (De Jong & Van Driel, 2001;Justi & Gilbert, 2000Zimmermann, 2000), or when textbooks and other curriculum material reinforce or introduce alternative conceptions (Fischler & Siefert, 2001). Hawkes (1996) and others (e.g., Fensham & Kass, 1988;Taber, 1995) point out that alternative conceptions in chemistry textbooks are surprisingly commonplace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teaching of models and modelling is especially difficult when teachers lack pedagogical content knowledge (De Jong & Van Driel, 2001;Justi & Gilbert, 2000Zimmermann, 2000), or when textbooks and other curriculum material reinforce or introduce alternative conceptions (Fischler & Siefert, 2001). Hawkes (1996) and others (e.g., Fensham & Kass, 1988;Taber, 1995) point out that alternative conceptions in chemistry textbooks are surprisingly commonplace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%