2016
DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1153510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structural-personal interaction: Occupational deprivation and asylum seekers in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, however, occupational justice research has primarily focused on marginalized populations in extenuating circumstances, such as immigrants, refugees, and prison inmates (Bailliard, 2013; Crawford, Turpin, Nayar, Steel, & Durand, 2016; Whiteford, 1997, 2005). Occupational scientists have much to offer through turning their analytical gaze to the problem of urban neighborhood environments and the many challenges those environments pose to creating an occupationally just society for the people who live there.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, however, occupational justice research has primarily focused on marginalized populations in extenuating circumstances, such as immigrants, refugees, and prison inmates (Bailliard, 2013; Crawford, Turpin, Nayar, Steel, & Durand, 2016; Whiteford, 1997, 2005). Occupational scientists have much to offer through turning their analytical gaze to the problem of urban neighborhood environments and the many challenges those environments pose to creating an occupationally just society for the people who live there.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While onshore applications for refugee status are being processed, some refugees are granted bridging visas and allowed to live in the wider community but with limited or no work rights (Van Selm 2000; Fleay & Hartley 2015). On one hand, bridging and temporary visas have hampered humanitarian migrants' employment prospects (Marston 2004) and caused distress and fear particularly in regard to the uncertainty about their refugee claims in Australia (Fleay et al 2013;Fleay & Hartley 2015;Crawford et al 2016). On the other hand, being able to live in the community, instead of in immigration detention, provides opportunities for learning the local language and developing contacts with members of the majority groups and thus enhancing human and social capital.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They described work as overcoming their social and spatial isolation in society, and as bringing peace of mind, identity and a broader sphere of action (Lintner & Elsen, 2018). Similar to previous accounts of refugees and asylum seekers deprived of productive occupation, not having opportunities to occupy themselves resulted in excessive rumination about their past and future, feelings of uselessness and diminished psychological wellbeing (See for example Burchett & Matheson, 2010;Crawford, Turpin, Nayar, Steel, & Durand, 2016). Harking back to Wright St. Clair et al (2018), however, Smith (2018) reports that asylum seekers in the United Kingdom who found meaningful things to do for others were better able to meet their personal and cultural needs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%