2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2013.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stratification of gastric cancer risk in Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three recognized high risk regions worldwide, Eastern Asia, Central and Eastern Europe and Latin America. While there may be over-diagnoses in Eastern Asian countries [2], underreporting has been a concern for Latin American countries [3]. Interestingly, compared with the other high risk regions, Lati American countries show more pronounced geographical variations in gastric cancer incidence and mortality [4], even marked variations within countries [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three recognized high risk regions worldwide, Eastern Asia, Central and Eastern Europe and Latin America. While there may be over-diagnoses in Eastern Asian countries [2], underreporting has been a concern for Latin American countries [3]. Interestingly, compared with the other high risk regions, Lati American countries show more pronounced geographical variations in gastric cancer incidence and mortality [4], even marked variations within countries [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chronic outcome is understandable considering that H. pylori, over the millennia of human infections, has established multiple mechanisms to evade our immune responses through fast and confluent adaptation by high mutation rates and antigenic variation 27 combined with dysregulation of T-cell responses (reviewed in 28 ). The many escape routes are reflected in both the shortcomings of conventional H. pylori vaccine development 29 and the high re-infection rate in many parts of the world after eradication of infection with antibiotics 30,31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17) Although it is a worldwide problem, its incidence varies across countries, where the incidence is high in Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Honduras, Salvador, and is low in India, Australia, Thailand, and New Zealand. (16, 18) Differences in incidence have led to a wide disparity in the management of patients with this premalignant condition. In Japan there is universal screening of the population, while in countries with a low incidence rate, screening is not considered cost effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%