2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stereotyper and the chameleon: The effects of stereotype use on perceivers’ mimicry

Abstract: Interpersonal dynamics may play a crucial role in the perpetuation of stereotypes. In an experimental study, participants interacted with a confederate who provided either stereotypeconsistent or stereotype-inconsistent descriptions about the elderly. Based on the assumption that mimicry represents a social glue that fosters interpersonal liking and affiliation, we assessed the extent to which participants mimicked the nonverbal behaviors of the confederate as a function of the stereotypicality of the descript… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other issues include that the fidelity of the visual prominence cues may have been less than ideal. Finally, the assumption underlying mimicry influencing liking and liking influencing mimicry is that mimicry increases similarity between people and increased similarity is associated with liking (e.g., Castelli et al 2009). The sample in the study was female whereas the ECA had a male face and other effects may be obtained when the gender of the ECA and participants match (e.g., Ruttkay et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other issues include that the fidelity of the visual prominence cues may have been less than ideal. Finally, the assumption underlying mimicry influencing liking and liking influencing mimicry is that mimicry increases similarity between people and increased similarity is associated with liking (e.g., Castelli et al 2009). The sample in the study was female whereas the ECA had a male face and other effects may be obtained when the gender of the ECA and participants match (e.g., Ruttkay et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity is thought to be a key factor in non-conscious mimicry. Through the process of non-conscious mimicry, individuals are able to take on the gestures and mannerisms of the other person, allowing them to increase their similarity to another (Castelli et al 2009). It is well established that when people perceive themselves as similar to another person they will like the other person more (Nass and Moon 2000; Heine et al 2009).…”
Section: Non-conscious Mimicry Similarity and Likingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, people who are mimicked tend to act in accordance with the stereotypes that others hold for them (Leander, Chartrand, & Wood, 2010). Further, people who express stereotypical attitudes tend to be mimicked more than those expressing nonstereotypical attitudes (Castelli, Pavan, Ferrari, & Kashima, 2009). Thus, the relationship between mimicry and stereotyping/prejudice is complex: it sometimes reinforces stereotypical behavior, but sometimes reduces prejudice.…”
Section: Self-other Overlapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castelli, Pavan, Ferrari, & Kashima, 2009;Dolderer, Mummendey, & Rothermund, 2009;Kashima, 2000;Plaks et al, 2001;Richards & Hewstone, 2001;Sherman, Stroessner, Conrey, & Azam, 2005;Vonk, 2002). The evidence for stereotypes' robustness to change is impressive.…”
Section: Implications Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%