2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The steady-state response of the cerebral cortex to the beat of music reflects both the comprehension of music and attention

Abstract: The brain’s analyses of speech and music share a range of neural resources and mechanisms. Music displays a temporal structure of complexity similar to that of speech, unfolds over comparable timescales, and elicits cognitive demands in tasks involving comprehension and attention. During speech processing, synchronized neural activity of the cerebral cortex in the delta and theta frequency bands tracks the envelope of a speech signal, and this neural activity is modulated by high-level cortical functions such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(75 reference statements)
8
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kong et al [27] reported that the central area was activated strongly while listening to speech. The above-mentioned result is supportive of the findings of previous studies [12], [27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kong et al [27] reported that the central area was activated strongly while listening to speech. The above-mentioned result is supportive of the findings of previous studies [12], [27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results suggest that the frontal area is important to classify brain states. Meltzer et al [12] showed that the EEG responses to the beat of the music were larger in the frontal, fronto-parietal, and central areas. Kong et al [27] reported that the central area was activated strongly while listening to speech.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, our stimulus protocol could provide the means to investigate the effects of attention on responses throughout the auditory pathway. Investigations of effects of attention on subcortical (Rinne et al, 2008;Forte et al, 2017;Galbraith et al, 1995;Holmes et al, 2018) and cortical responses (Rif et al, 1991;Woldorff, 1993;Meltzer et al, 2015;Saupe et al, 2009;Holmes et al, 2018) have previously been conducted in isolation. This stimulus can also be applied to investigate differences in adaptation and sensitivity to changes temporal structure across groups (older vs younger adults; people with hearing impairment vs people without).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Music can produce reliable and powerful emotional responses in listeners, which can increase music engagement (Habibi & Damasio, 2014;Menon & Levitin, 2005;Särkämö & Soto, 2012). While there are numerous studies showing different brain areas associated with passive music apprehension and processing musical features, such as rhythm, pitch, and melodies (Habibi & Damasio, 2014;Särkämö & Soto, 2012;Meltzer et al, 2015;Rolison & Edworthy, 2013) little research has explored the specific effects of highly anticipated but deviant music moments on brain activity and emotions. Different music genres create these deviants in different ways, inducing contrasting levels of tension resulting in different levels of anticipation and associated emotions (Koelsch, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%