1986
DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(86)90121-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The status and ecology of the dama gazelle in the aïr and ténéré national nature reserve, Niger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low use B. aegyptiaca trees was surprising because this species was the most common at our study site and gazelles are known to feed on B. aegyptiaca (Grettenberger and Newby, 1986;Grettenberger, 1987;Hall, 1992). We do not have any logical explanation as to why Dorcas gazelles used B. aegyptiaca trees less than Acacia trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The low use B. aegyptiaca trees was surprising because this species was the most common at our study site and gazelles are known to feed on B. aegyptiaca (Grettenberger and Newby, 1986;Grettenberger, 1987;Hall, 1992). We do not have any logical explanation as to why Dorcas gazelles used B. aegyptiaca trees less than Acacia trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The majority of these plants were in wadi habitats as highest gazelle concentrations and most favorable tracking conditions were found here. The data indicated that the dorcas gazelle in the ATNNR, like the dama gazelle (Grettenberger and Newby 1986), was primarily a browser under the dry conditions prevailing during the study period. Leaves of the tree Maerua crassifolia and the shrub Leptadenia pyrotechnica were the most highly preferred food, but the trees Acacia tortilis and Balanites aegyptiaca, and the forb Chrozophora brocchiana, furnished the bulk of their diet.…”
Section: Feeding Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For studying the feeding habits of Persian gazelle in Bamoo National Park, direct observation (Al-Hazmi & Ghandour 1992, Goodson et al 1991, Grettenberger & Newby 1986, Holechek et al 1982, Mendelssohn et al 1997, Rominger et al 1988, Saltz & Ward 2000 was used as secondary method (beside pellet-group count method).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%