2017
DOI: 10.12911/22998993/77165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The State of Water and Wastewater Management in the Municipalities of the Polesie National Park

Abstract: The aim of the work is to present the current state of water and wastewater management in the municipalities where the Polesie National Park (PNP) is located. The PNP is situated in Lublin Voivodeship, in the area of six municipalities: Sosnowica, Hańsk, Urszulin, Stary Brus, Wierzbica and Ludwin. The data used in this paper, were obtained on the basis of the surveys conducted in these municipalities in 2016 by the Department of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy of the University of Life Sciences in Lublin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented data indicate that the plants with drainage systems remain the most popular solution. The previously conducted questionnaire surveys showed that in the communes located in the Polesie and Roztocze National Parks, the plants with drainage systems constituted 85% and 93%, respectively, among the technological solutions employed in household wastewater treatment plants [Jóźwiakowski et al 2017;Jóźwiakowski et al 2018]. Similarly high (>80%) share of plants with drainage systems was also noted in the Parczew and Biała Podlaska counties, located in the Lublin province [Micek et al 2018;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The presented data indicate that the plants with drainage systems remain the most popular solution. The previously conducted questionnaire surveys showed that in the communes located in the Polesie and Roztocze National Parks, the plants with drainage systems constituted 85% and 93%, respectively, among the technological solutions employed in household wastewater treatment plants [Jóźwiakowski et al 2017;Jóźwiakowski et al 2018]. Similarly high (>80%) share of plants with drainage systems was also noted in the Parczew and Biała Podlaska counties, located in the Lublin province [Micek et al 2018;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Among the aforementioned solutions, the most frequently used technological system consists of the initial settling tank and drainage pipe [8][9][10], mainly due to the low construction costs [11]. However, the application of this solution is the reason of much controversy in Poland [6,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite considerable development, the size of the sewerage network in relation to the demand is still very small. In rural areas, especially those with a highly dispersed development pattern, the quantity and quality of sanitation infrastructure can be improved by constructing on-site domestic wastewater treatment plants (Bogusz et al 2020;Jóźwiakowski et al 2017;Micek et al 2018). In the years 2006-2015, the number of on-site treatment plants in Poland increased by 476%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, under the current legal regulations regarding the construction of on-site domestic wastewater treatment plants, the principal criterion for selecting a wastewater treatment technology is the cost of purchase and assembly of a treatment installation. As a result, most of the the existing on-site domestic wastewater treatment plants in Poland are the cheapest type of treatment plant, i.e systems with a drainfield (Bogusz et al 2020;Jóźwiakowski et al 2017;Micek et al 2018). Many authors believe that systems with a soakaway drainfield area pose a serious threat to the quality of surface waters and groundwater, and should not be used as stand-alone wastewater treatment installations, but only as a treatment step, to discharge biologically treated wastewater into the ground (Walczowski 2013; Jóźwiakowski 2012; Bugajski et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%