1984
DOI: 10.2307/3711319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stark-Bainbridge Theory of Religion: A Critical Analysis and Counter Proposals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem of explanation is often neglected in the literature, as many studies of secularization and religious change are descriptive in orientation and document the rise or decline of particular types of religion (e.g., Voyé 1999;Lambert 1999;Roof 2000;Roof, Carroll, and Roozen 1995). This descriptive orientation is shared by Becker, De Hart, and Mens (1997) and Wallis and Bruce (1984), who have demonstrated that the exodus from the Christian churches outnumbers the growth of new types of religion and conclude that the net trend is one of secularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem of explanation is often neglected in the literature, as many studies of secularization and religious change are descriptive in orientation and document the rise or decline of particular types of religion (e.g., Voyé 1999;Lambert 1999;Roof 2000;Roof, Carroll, and Roozen 1995). This descriptive orientation is shared by Becker, De Hart, and Mens (1997) and Wallis and Bruce (1984), who have demonstrated that the exodus from the Christian churches outnumbers the growth of new types of religion and conclude that the net trend is one of secularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have replicated these results in a parallel study of religion in Canada (Bainbridge and Stark, 1982). For a critique of this theoretical approach, see Wallis and Bruce (1984).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in the case of non-universal otherworldly compensators is an explanation provided: an otherworldly goal is substituted fora this-worldly goal because for many people the latter is unattainable or only partiaUy attainable. This reasoning appears to assume that otherworldly compensators are only desired as substitutes for this-worldly, more tangible and more immediate rewards that would be preferable if they could be achieved (Wallis and Bruce 1984).…”
Section: Demandas Universal Ancl Compensatorymentioning
confidence: 98%