2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The standardized EEG electrode array of the IFCN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
230
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
230
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The EEG signal was recorded from 64 channels arranged in the International 10–20 montage (Seeck et al . ) in a TMS‐compatible Ag/AgCl sintered ring electrode cap (EasyCap GmbH, Woerthsee‐Etterschlag, Germany), with FCz as the reference electrode and PPO1h as the ground electrode. The impedance at the skin–EEG electrodes interface was kept < 5 kΩ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEG signal was recorded from 64 channels arranged in the International 10–20 montage (Seeck et al . ) in a TMS‐compatible Ag/AgCl sintered ring electrode cap (EasyCap GmbH, Woerthsee‐Etterschlag, Germany), with FCz as the reference electrode and PPO1h as the ground electrode. The impedance at the skin–EEG electrodes interface was kept < 5 kΩ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1). EEG was recorded using the standardized array of 25 electrodes, including six electrodes in the inferior temporal chain (F9/10, T9/ 10, P9/10) in addition to the electrodes of the 10-20 system [20].…”
Section: Patients and Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prospectively performed ESI of IC-EEG and II-EEG recorded during LTM. We used the standard 25-electrode array recommended by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology [20] and agematched template head models to minimize the additional workload of processing the LTM data, in order to fit into a busy clinical setting. Our goals were to determine the feasibility of IC-ESI and to compare it with II-ESI and with the conventional neuroimaging methods (MRI, PET, SPECT).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulus conditions were standardized by using maximum magnetic flux density (2 Tesla) for all stimulations . For COMS, the magnetic coil was placed over Cz´ . For CEMS, the coil was first placed over C7 and then moved up towards C6 until the highest reproducible dCMAP was obtained .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each run of tests, at least five stimuli were delivered in order to achieve the highest possible dCMAP amplitude showing <10% variation from the preceding two stimulations. In order to avoid twitch potentiation, stimuli were separated by a pause of at least 40 seconds . Stimulation at FRC was determined by visual observation of abdominal movements after instructing subjects to breathe out and hold their breath until the magnetic stimulus was delivered (the stimulus was then deployed within 1 second after FRC had been reached).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%