2018
DOI: 10.1111/ene.13676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ictal and interictal electric source imaging in pre‐surgical evaluation: a prospective study

Abstract: The II-ESI and IC-ESI of LTM data have high feasibility and their localization accuracy is similar to that of conventional neuroimaging methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study based on low‐density EEG (19 channels), ESI reached a 65% concordance . Another study using also low‐density EEG obtained a localization accuracy of 51% and 62% using two different inverse solution methods, which was similar to other conventional neuroimaging methods (structural MRI, PET, and SPECT) . In our study, the percentage of concordance with the presumed EZ using ESI reached 90% in TLE and 57% in ETLE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study based on low‐density EEG (19 channels), ESI reached a 65% concordance . Another study using also low‐density EEG obtained a localization accuracy of 51% and 62% using two different inverse solution methods, which was similar to other conventional neuroimaging methods (structural MRI, PET, and SPECT) . In our study, the percentage of concordance with the presumed EZ using ESI reached 90% in TLE and 57% in ETLE.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…7 Another study using also low-density EEG obtained a localization accuracy of 51% and 62% using two different inverse solution methods, which was similar to other conventional neuroimaging methods (structural MRI, PET, and SPECT). 31 In our study, the percentage of concordance with the presumed EZ using ESI reached 90% in TLE and 57% in ETLE. The differences in the results may be explained by methodologic differences between the studies: different forward models (here, we used a sophisticated realistic head model including six compartments-scalp, bone, cerebral spinal fluid [CSF], gray matter, white matter, air) and inverse solutions.…”
Section: F I G U R Esupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Nevertheless, these results do not necessarily mean that imperfect spatial sampling precludes source localization. Even with < 32 electrodes, source localization allows to gain valuable insight about the underlying sources, particularly in applications with well-defined focal activity such as epileptic spikes (15, 5860).…”
Section: Number and Positioning Of The Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if too many dipoles are assumed, spurious sources will be introduced. Nevertheless, dipole source localization can produce reasonable results under some particular conditions (12), in particular in localizing the irritative zone in focal epilepsy (1315) or the localization of primary sensory areas in evoked potentials, such as the sensorimotor cortex in surgical candidates (16). Dipole source localization is still widely used in the MEG community for these clinical applications (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scalp EEG recordings, using the standard 25-electrode array of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology [ 5 ] showed build-up of rhythmic 4–5 Hz ictal activity in the basal temporal area, 8–37 s after the clinical onset. Both interictal and ictal EEG source imaging, using the methodology previously validated in a large prospective study [ 6 ] localised to the left antero-mesial temporal area ( Fig. 1 A).…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%