1981
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.17.1.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The standard object-sorting task as a measure of conceptual organization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…established by Markman et al (1981).' The two scoring systems revealed the same effects, with only one exception.…”
Section: Scoringmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…established by Markman et al (1981).' The two scoring systems revealed the same effects, with only one exception.…”
Section: Scoringmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, when performance demands are minimized, preschoolers are sometimes able to use superordinate relations in classification. For example, Markman, Cox, and Machida (1981) demonstrated that when competing tendencies are reduced by having preschoolers sort objects into bags rather than on an open surface (on a table), children are better able to classify at superordinate levels. Bven under these favorable conditions, however, superordinate classification was not easily accomplished by these young children; only 40% of the items in their task were classified on the basis of superordinate relations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Requests for identity decisions (Osborne & Calhoun, 1998;Waxman & Namy, 1997), the use of real objects (Deak & Bauer, 1996), the spatial aspects of the task (Markman, Cox & Machida, 1981) and the use of nouns rather than relational language (Dunham & Dunham, 1995) all enhance the proportion of taxonomic decisions. So, it could be that with different tasks and instructions, LEW could show preserved taxonomic skills.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, later studies showed that young children used taxonomic relations for sorting when a different sorting context was presented (e.g., Markman, Cox, & Machida, 1981), when a brief training was administered (Smiley & Brown, 1979), and when a more constrained request was given (e.g., Waxman & Namy, 1997). These findings thus suggest that from early on both taxonomic and thematic organizations are present in children's conceptual structure, but taxonomic relations are initially used in a relatively limited range of contexts but gradually replace the use of thematic relations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%