2010
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.585364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘Standard’ for Poststroke Aphasia Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies will help to further improve the estimation, but no prognostic study will ever be able to provide a prediction model with 100% certain predictions. Other differences with our study are that the authors1 used 3 months as the principle endpoint and excluded patients with severe aphasia 21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Future studies will help to further improve the estimation, but no prognostic study will ever be able to provide a prediction model with 100% certain predictions. Other differences with our study are that the authors1 used 3 months as the principle endpoint and excluded patients with severe aphasia 21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A study by Mimura et al (1998) noted that an early recovery of left hemisphere CBF correlated with lessened initial impairment of language and better recovery within a year. In summary, a continuing hemisphere hypoperfusion and the delay in return of normal CBF and cerebral metabolic rate (CMR) adjacent to lesions during the early post-stroke period leads to poorer long-term recovery (Hillis 2010) [See Table 1 for summary] Naeser et al (1989Naeser et al ( , 1998 Speech comprehension has better recovery compared to expression Mazzoni et al (1992) Transcortical sensory aphasics have a worse prognosis than Broca's or transcortical motor aphasics Basso et al (1979) Phonology improves earlier than semantic or syntactic language.…”
Section: Metabolic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported that prognosis is not better for non-fluent aphasia compared to fluent aphasia,13 and predictability is less but the degree of improvement changed by the severity of stroke or aphasia 14-16. According to studies in 2010, language dysfunctions after stroke seem to show highly predictable recovery which is related to initial impairments and 70% of patients recovered during the first 90 days 11,17…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%