2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors predicting post-stroke aphasia recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(59 reference statements)
6
51
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This study specifically evaluated the influence of language and cognitive abilities on 24 anomia therapy outcomes; however, stroke-related (i.e., lesion site and size) and 25 demographic variables may also influence recovery and treatment response (Marshall & 26 Phillips, 1983;Meinzer et al, 2010;Plowman, Hentz, & Ellis, 2012;Watila & Balarabe, 2015). 27…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directions 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study specifically evaluated the influence of language and cognitive abilities on 24 anomia therapy outcomes; however, stroke-related (i.e., lesion site and size) and 25 demographic variables may also influence recovery and treatment response (Marshall & 26 Phillips, 1983;Meinzer et al, 2010;Plowman, Hentz, & Ellis, 2012;Watila & Balarabe, 2015). 27…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directions 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it is also important that we understand which factors predict therapy success in order to 14 identify who may respond to therapy and to facilitate optimal recruitment and distribution of 15 therapy services (Watila & Balarabe, 2015). 16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have provided general support for the efficacy of aphasia rehabilitation (Brady et al, 2012;Robey, 1998;Wisenburn & Mahoney, 2009); however, not all individuals' respond to or benefit equally from intervention (Best & Nickels, 2000;Nickels & Best, 1996b;Plowman et al, 2012). A number of factors have been identified that may influence recovery from aphasia in the acute phase, such as stroke-related (e.g., site and size of lesion) patient-related (e.g., age, gender) and treatment-related factors (Laska et al, 2001;Pedersen et al, 1995;Seniow et al, 2009b;Watila & Balarabe, 2015). However, it is difficult to ascertain predictors of treatment-induced recovery in the acute and subacute phase of stroke, because of the potential confounds of spontaneous recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has previously been debate in the literature regarding the influence of age on rehabilitation outcomes for aphasia (Basso, 1992;Plowman et al, 2012;Watila & Balarabe, 2015). Whilst the neuroscience literature suggests that training induced plasticity occurs more readily in younger brains (i.e., Age Matters) (Kleim & Jones, 2008), a review conducted by Basso (1992) found that anagraphical factors, including age, had minimal effect on the therapeutic outcomes for aphasia rehabilitation.…”
Section: Participant Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation