2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stabilizing effect of social distancing: Cross-country differences in financial market response to COVID-19 pandemic policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8. Research conducted by (Bickley et al, 2021). The purpose of this study was to analyze the stabilizing effect of social distancing practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic policy on financial markets, considering differences between countries.…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8. Research conducted by (Bickley et al, 2021). The purpose of this study was to analyze the stabilizing effect of social distancing practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic policy on financial markets, considering differences between countries.…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, local financial management has been in the spotlight in the context of public policy. This phenomenon has been triggered by various factors, including the increasing complexity of local finances, public demand for better public services, and the need to ensure transparency and accountability in public financial management (Bickley et al, 2021;Urquía-Grande et al, 2022). In addition, demographic changes, technological developments, and evolving economic challenges also affect the dynamics of regional financial management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engelhardt et al (2021) concluded that the degree of trust in government could affect stock market volatility, so in countries with more trust in government, stock market volatility during the COVID-19 Crisis is lower. Some studies have focused solely on health policies; Bickley et al (2021) study the stabilizing effect of maintaining social distance and the response of the financial markets of different countries to health policies during the COVID-19 outbreak. In this study was shown that quarantine policies affected about 53% of markets in different countries and about 61% of cases market efficiency has increased.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have focused solely on health policies; Bickley et al. (2021) study the stabilizing effect of maintaining social distance and the response of the financial markets of different countries to health policies during the COVID-19 outbreak.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baig et al [ 14 ] employed different dimension of pandemic related data and suggested that Stringency index which proxied for social distancing measures by government elevated the US market volatility significantly. Bickley et al [ 15 ] employed Hurst exponent method to measure the volatility persistence by comparing the pre and post policy exponents in conjunction with COVID-19 impact and found that stay-at-home policies elicited a stabilising response in market volatility across 28 countries in 6 continents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%