2019
DOI: 10.1002/jaba.620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stability of function of automatically reinforced vocal stereotypy over time

Abstract: Although prior research has suggested the function of socially reinforced problem behavior can change across time, the stability of the function of automatically reinforced behavior is largely unknown. Further, some authors have suggested automatically reinforced behavior is likely to enter into socially mediated contingencies. The present study compared 2 functional analyses conducted on the same target behavior at least 1 year apart. Participants were 6 individuals diagnosed with an intellectual or developme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model of functional analysis has been replicated in several hundred studies (Beavers et al, 2013;Hanley et al, 2003). It has been used in assessing the operant function of other topographies of problem behavior besides self-injury (e.g., aggression, property destruction, inappropriate vocalizations, elopement, food refusal, and stereotypy; e.g., Bachmeyer et al, 2019;Boyle & Adamson, 2017;Fisher et al, 2013;Hausman et al, 2020;Saini et al, 2019;Shawler et al, 2020;Wunderlich et al, 2020). It has also been used to illustrate the flexibility of test conditions for other unique sources of social positive reinforcement (e.g., access to leisure items and food) and social negative reinforcement (e.g., the termination of social interactions, medical routines, and loud noises; Harper et al, 2013;Iwata, Pace et al, 1990;McCord et al, 2001;Schlichenmeyer et al, 2013;Tiger et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This model of functional analysis has been replicated in several hundred studies (Beavers et al, 2013;Hanley et al, 2003). It has been used in assessing the operant function of other topographies of problem behavior besides self-injury (e.g., aggression, property destruction, inappropriate vocalizations, elopement, food refusal, and stereotypy; e.g., Bachmeyer et al, 2019;Boyle & Adamson, 2017;Fisher et al, 2013;Hausman et al, 2020;Saini et al, 2019;Shawler et al, 2020;Wunderlich et al, 2020). It has also been used to illustrate the flexibility of test conditions for other unique sources of social positive reinforcement (e.g., access to leisure items and food) and social negative reinforcement (e.g., the termination of social interactions, medical routines, and loud noises; Harper et al, 2013;Iwata, Pace et al, 1990;McCord et al, 2001;Schlichenmeyer et al, 2013;Tiger et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%