Introduction. In analyses of the relationship between various abilities and general intelligence, certain ones have appeared to be but slightly, if at all, related to ability in general, and to these the designation of special abilities or talents has been applied. Theoretically, artistic ability has been denoted as one of these, since " artistic aptitudes appear to be controlled primarily by special gifts rather than by general ability" (29, p. 505 ).3 Actual evidence in support of this contention exists, however, only for that limited phase of artistic performance which has been designated as representative drawing. Furthermore, statistical data supplying such evidence of a low degree of relationship between general intelligence and ability in representative drawing have been derived, in the main, from investigations dealing with unselected groups, such as those of Ayer (2), Elderton (8), Fischlovitz (9), and Ivanoff (16). These studies have uniformly shown low, positive correlations between measures of the two variables.4Complete agreement with these findings does not appear in the results of studies dealing with subjects selected for superior ability in art as manifested in other activities in addition to representation of single objects. The investigations of Kerschensteiner (17), Kik (18) and Terman (38) indicate that