Two experiments assessed the moderating impact of task context on the relationship between reward and cardiovascular response. Randomly assigned to the cells of a 2 (task context: reward vs. demand) x 2 (reward value: low vs. high) between-persons design, participants performed either a memory task with an unclear performance standard (Experiment 1) or a visual scanning task with an unfixed performance standard (Experiment 2). Before performing the task-where participants could earn either a low or a high reward-participants responded to questions about either task reward or task demand. In accordance with the theoretical predictions derived from Wright's (1996) integrative model, reactivity of pre-ejection period increased with reward value if participants had rated aspects of task reward before performing the task. If they had rated task demand, pre-ejection period did not differ as a function of reward.
MANIPULATION CHECKS AND CARDIAC REACTIVITY 4Pay Attention to Your Manipulation Checks! Reward Impact on Cardiac Reactivity is Moderated by Task Context.Common sense suggests that the more you desire something the harder you will work to get it. In cardiovascular psychophysiology this idea is reflected by the hypothesis that cardiovascular responses are a direct function of reward value: the more valuable a reward, the higher the cardiovascular response (e.g., Belanger & Feldman, 1962;Brenner, Beauchaine, & Sylvers, 2005;Elliot, 1969;Fowles, 1983;Lipsitt, Reilly, Butcher, & Greenwood, 1976;Tranel, 1983;Smith, Allred, Morrison, & Carlson, 1989;Smith, Nealey, Kircher, & Limon, 1997;Smith, Ruiz, & Uchino, 2000).Drawing on an analysis by Wright (1996), , 2009